1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02463.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of onychomycosis in general practice

Abstract: Analysis of the computer records of 100 general practices from the CompuFile Doctors Independent Network revealed 1492 patients receiving treatment for onychomycosis in the first 6 months of 1994 with terbinafine, tioconazole, amorolfine or griseofulvin. These records indicated the average treatment time for each agent, number of general practitioner consultations and incidence of hospital referrals and minor surgery. Applying standard costs to this resource consumption gave the direct costs for each of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The infection must be proven by microscopy or culture and confirmed by an approved pathology provider.’ This limits the use of affordable terbinafine to those with nail disease only, and obtaining it for remote Aboriginal patients via Section 100 prescription is often the only way rural general practitioners or district medical officers can obtain it for extensive skin disease. Overseas studies have shown that terbinafine is a cost‐effective treatment because of the shorter duration of therapy, particularly in treating onychomycosis 20,21 . The present study and also anecdotal reports from community members and medical practitioners show that terbinafine is an effective and acceptable treatment for tinea (in particular tinea corporis), which has the potential to turn around the perceptions of health staff and community members that tinea is a ‘normal’ condition for those living in remote Aboriginal communities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The infection must be proven by microscopy or culture and confirmed by an approved pathology provider.’ This limits the use of affordable terbinafine to those with nail disease only, and obtaining it for remote Aboriginal patients via Section 100 prescription is often the only way rural general practitioners or district medical officers can obtain it for extensive skin disease. Overseas studies have shown that terbinafine is a cost‐effective treatment because of the shorter duration of therapy, particularly in treating onychomycosis 20,21 . The present study and also anecdotal reports from community members and medical practitioners show that terbinafine is an effective and acceptable treatment for tinea (in particular tinea corporis), which has the potential to turn around the perceptions of health staff and community members that tinea is a ‘normal’ condition for those living in remote Aboriginal communities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…By calculating direct treatment costs (drugs, medical consultations, minor surgery, etc.) and mycological and clinical cure rates (based on the results of a previous multinational study), they found that terbinafine was the most cost‐effective option 4 . However this study also presented a flaw leading to an incorrect conclusion.…”
Section: General Retrospective Pharmacoeconomic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Humphrey et al . performed a retrospective analysis to compare the cost‐effectiveness of terbinafine, tioconazole, amorolfine and griseofulvin 4 . By calculating direct treatment costs (drugs, medical consultations, minor surgery, etc.)…”
Section: General Retrospective Pharmacoeconomic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results have substantiated that allylamine-type drugs because of their higher bioavailability and persistent retention at the superficial fungal infection site, provide higher cure rates, lower relapse rates and shorter treatment regimens than the azoles. Table 3 illustrates applications and comparative cost effectiveness [35][36][37][38] for the leading topical antifungals used in tinea pedis. In summary, looking at the parameters like efficacy, safety profile, patient compliance, relapse rates and cost effectiveness, butenafine hydrochloride is a promising potential alternative topical antimycotic agent for the treatment of tinea pedis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%