A retrospective cohort study: dual cannula combined with modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique versus nonrepair in hip arthroscopic surgery of femoroacetabular impingement

Abstract

Background Over the years, with the improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities for hip joint diseases and the advancements in surgical technology, hip arthroscopy has been extensively used. At present, there is ongoing controversy among scholars about whether it is necessary to close the joint capsule after hip arthroscopy. In addition, the clinical effect of repairing the hip joint capsule after hip arthroscopy remains uncertain. Purpose To evaluate the effect of our modified shoelace suture technique on postoperative hip function and to investigate whether complete closure of the hip capsule is reliable and safe. Study Design Retrospective study; Levels of evidence: III. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing hip arthroscopy by a solitary high-volume hip arthroscopic surgeon. The patients were categorized into two groups. The first group consisted of patients who underwent the modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique. The other group consisted of those who did not receive capsular closure after hip arthroscopy. Patient-reported outcomes including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score of Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) were obtained at a minimum of 12 months. Any complications during follow-up were identified and recorded. Results A total of 100 patients were followed up for 12–15 months, with an average of (12.3 ± 5.3) months in the study. There were 50 patients in the shoelace capsular closure group (CC group) and 50 patients in the non-capsular closure group (NC group). The surgical time in the suture group was significantly longer than that in the non-suture group. However, there was no statistically significant disparity in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. The mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS of the CC and NC group were significantly improved compared to preoperative scores at 6 and 12 postoperative months ( P < 0.001). Compared with the NC group, the CC group showed a significant improvement in the mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS at 6 postoperative months (t = 4.885, P <0.001; t = 5.984, P <0.001; t = 4.279, P <0.001; t = 3.875, P <0.001). The mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS at 12 postoperative months were significantly better in the CC group than in the NC group (t = 5.165, P <0.001; t = 3.697, P <0.001; t = 4.840, P <0.001; t = 3.579, P = 0.001). There were no serious complications during the perioperative period. Conclusion The modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique is a reliable and secure method that can be used ...