2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective analysis of risk factors and outcomes in patients with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bloodstream infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Previous studies revealed cephalosporin exposure as an independent risk factor for ESBL-producing E. coli. 22 This is because when under high cephalosporin stress, E. coli can acquire multiple ESBL genes and increase their transcriptional expression. 23 The broad use of cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones therefore influences the microbiologic environment and antibiotic susceptibility.…”
Section: Comparison Of Esbl-producing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Previous studies revealed cephalosporin exposure as an independent risk factor for ESBL-producing E. coli. 22 This is because when under high cephalosporin stress, E. coli can acquire multiple ESBL genes and increase their transcriptional expression. 23 The broad use of cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones therefore influences the microbiologic environment and antibiotic susceptibility.…”
Section: Comparison Of Esbl-producing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we aimed to quantify the potential clinical and economic impact of ESBL production. In some studies, they showed increased mortality associated with ESBL-positive infection, 10,11 while our previous study 12 had come to the opposite conclusion that patients with BSI due to ESBL-EC did not show a higher mortality and a longer hospitalization than patients with BSI due to non-ESBL-EC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, in our study, for non-ESBL-EC infection group, only 26% of patients used recommended antimicrobials (cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides), 85% of patients used BLBLI and carbapenems. The reason why second-line and thirdline antibiotics are chosen as empirical treatment drugs can be explained in our previous study, 12 older age, the presence of comorbidities, ICU stay, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), previous use of antibiotics, previous colonization with ESBL-producing commensal bacteria, and higher ESBL prevalence were identified as risk factors for acquisition of BSI caused by ESBLproducing Enterobacterales. [33][34][35][36] There are many risk factors for ESBL infection in patients with non-ESBL-EC BSI, so clinicians tend to choose antimicrobial agents covering ESBL-producing bacteria as empirical antibiotic therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we aimed to quantify the potential clinial and economic impact of ESBL production. In some studies, they showed increased mortality associated with ESBLpositive infection 8; 9 ,while our previous study 10 had come to the opposite conclusion that patients with BSI due to ESBL-EC did not show a higher mortality and a longer hospitalization than patients with BSI due to non-ESBL-EC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%