2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective analysis of contamination and periphyton PICT patterns for the antifoulant irgarol 1051, around a small marina on the Swedish west coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different outcomes in terms of PICT induction between this study and that of Dahl and Blanck (20) are probably due to the environmental contamination of Irgarol between the years 1994 and 2001. This is further supported by the study of Blanck et al (11) which shows that PICT to Irgarol has slowly developed in environmental periphyton communities in this area between 1994 and 2004. The spatial and temporal PICT pattern reported in that study also shows that community tolerance in waters near the microcosm inlet is relatively high during midsummer, when this study was performed.…”
Section: Vol 75 2009 Irgarol Tolerance and Psba Genes In Periphytonsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The different outcomes in terms of PICT induction between this study and that of Dahl and Blanck (20) are probably due to the environmental contamination of Irgarol between the years 1994 and 2001. This is further supported by the study of Blanck et al (11) which shows that PICT to Irgarol has slowly developed in environmental periphyton communities in this area between 1994 and 2004. The spatial and temporal PICT pattern reported in that study also shows that community tolerance in waters near the microcosm inlet is relatively high during midsummer, when this study was performed.…”
Section: Vol 75 2009 Irgarol Tolerance and Psba Genes In Periphytonsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This value is five times higher than the EC 50 value detected in the background exposure microcosm (16 nM). However, here it is also important to note that the community tolerance level in the background community is relatively high compared to that in sensitive periphyton communities (3 to 4 nM) sampled in a less contaminated area nearby in the same year (11). The PICT signal was accompanied by TIS in the form of clear shifts in the distribution of morphologically distinct taxa (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Besides impact assessment, PICT can also be applied to study recovery trajectories and community resilience in aquatic environments (Blanck et al, 2009;Dorigo et al, 2010;Rotter et al, 2011). The Water Framework Directive aimed to progressively reduce the level of pollution for 43 priority pollutants that could threaten human health or ecosystems (WFD, 2000/60/EC).…”
Section: Pict Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As co-tolerance means that a community exposed to a given toxic agent becomes tolerant to another one, proper identification of the exact selection pressure might become more difficult when it occurs (Blanck et al 1988(Blanck et al , 2009). Application of the same methodology to natural in situ samples exposed to complex multi-metallic contaminations that are typical of urban areas is thus likely to lead to complicated tolerance patterns.…”
Section: Community Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%