International Conference on the Epidemiology and Control of Biological, Chemical and Physical Hazards in Pigs and Pork 2009
DOI: 10.31274/safepork-180809-835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective analysis of a high health commercial pig production system showing improved production and reduced antibiotic use after implementation of a PCV2 vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted however that this is a rough and subjective unit of measurement. However, the negative association found between the used parameter as a proxy for disease incidence and the level of biosecurity does suggest a lower level of disease in herds with better biosecurity indicating that indeed biosecurity could be seen as a tool for disease prevention as suggested before (Amass and Clark, 1999;Maes et al, 2004;Casal et al, 2007;European Commission, 2007;Maes et al, 2007;Gunn et al, 2008;Brockhoff et al, 2009;Brennan and Christley, 2012). The association was seen in relation with the internal biosecurity, which could be explained by the fact that part of the pre-listed symptoms, efor example lameness and skin problems, might be associated with management and pig-to-pig transmissible diseases by the farmer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It should be noted however that this is a rough and subjective unit of measurement. However, the negative association found between the used parameter as a proxy for disease incidence and the level of biosecurity does suggest a lower level of disease in herds with better biosecurity indicating that indeed biosecurity could be seen as a tool for disease prevention as suggested before (Amass and Clark, 1999;Maes et al, 2004;Casal et al, 2007;European Commission, 2007;Maes et al, 2007;Gunn et al, 2008;Brockhoff et al, 2009;Brennan and Christley, 2012). The association was seen in relation with the internal biosecurity, which could be explained by the fact that part of the pre-listed symptoms, efor example lameness and skin problems, might be associated with management and pig-to-pig transmissible diseases by the farmer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, vaccination may improve the overall health status of the pig while lowering the risk of (secondary) infection. Several studies confirm the reduction of antimicrobial usage after vaccination (Adam, 2009;Brockhoff et al, 2009;Aerts and Wertenbroek, 2011;Bak, 2011;Bak et al, 2011;Coube et al, 2012;Koenders and Wertenbroek, 2012;Tebar et al, 2012). Laanen et al (2013) found a positive association between biosecurity, production parameters and antimicrobial usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To be able to achieve this reduction, it is important to assist and guide farmers in this process, as they are generally aware of the problems and risks, but not sufficiently knowledgeable on the implications on herd level (Visschers et al., ). They are generally also willing to reduce their antimicrobial use but are unfamiliar with alternative solutions such as biosecurity improvements (Laanen et al., ; Postma et al., ; Postma et al., ) and improved immunization through vaccination against infections such as ileitis (Adam, ; Coube et al., ), porcine proliferative enteropathy (Bak and Rathkjen, ), porcine circovirus (Brockhoff et al., ; Aerts and Wertenbroek, ; Coube et al., ; Koenders and Wertenbroek, ) and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (Del Pozo Sacristán et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%