1983
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90297-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective analysis of 327 mandibular fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors reported the angle as the most frequently affected site [3,5,12,18], whereas, others reported this to be mandibular body [4,9,16] and symphysis [3]. In this study, the parasymphysis was the most frequently affected site (33%) and ZMC (9.5%) in mid face region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Many authors reported the angle as the most frequently affected site [3,5,12,18], whereas, others reported this to be mandibular body [4,9,16] and symphysis [3]. In this study, the parasymphysis was the most frequently affected site (33%) and ZMC (9.5%) in mid face region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…5,11,20 This vulnerability was explained by a number of predisposing factors including the presence of third molars, a thinner crosssectional area of the angle when compared with the tooth-bearing region and its biomechanical property that may be considered as a 'lever' area. 7 The large number of studies on the treatment of mandibular angle fracture reflects the fact that a consensus has not been reached for a single, ideal treatment method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Despite the evolution in the treatment of maxillofacial trauma, no single treatment modality has been revealed to be ideal for mandibular angle fractures. Size, shape, number and biomechanics of plate and screw systems with varying configurations and combinations used for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures are well documented and research continues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective in the treatment of mandibular fracture is to re-establish normal occlusion and masticatory function. Conservative treatment to achieve this is performed by immobilizing the mandible for the healing period by dental wiring, arch bars, cap splints, and gunning splints [8][9] . Operative treatment of mandibular fractures involves intraoral or extraoral opening of the fracture site and direct osteosynthesis with trans osseous wires, lag screws, or bone plates [10][11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%