2008
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-1756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Retroinhibition Approach Reveals a Tumor Cell–Autonomous Response to Rapamycin in Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract: Emerging evidence supporting the activation of the Aktmammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling network in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) progression has provided the rationale for exploring the therapeutic potential of inhibiting this pathway for HNSCC treatment.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The anti-proliferative effects in a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell line were induced with a rapamycin micromolar dosage higher than that used in our study (Aissat et al, 2008). In contrast, a recent study revealed that a nanomolar dose of rapamycin did not have an anti-proliferative effect on HNSCC cell lines in vitro, but did induce apoptosis of cancer cells in vivo by the anti-angiogenic effects of rapamycin (Amornphimoltham et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The anti-proliferative effects in a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell line were induced with a rapamycin micromolar dosage higher than that used in our study (Aissat et al, 2008). In contrast, a recent study revealed that a nanomolar dose of rapamycin did not have an anti-proliferative effect on HNSCC cell lines in vitro, but did induce apoptosis of cancer cells in vivo by the anti-angiogenic effects of rapamycin (Amornphimoltham et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Conversely, Gutkind and colleagues have used head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells expressing either WT mTOR or rapamycin-resistant mTOR to determine that mTORC1 inhibition in the tumor itself is necessary for the efficacy of rapamycin. 38 Therefore, in some situations, rapamycin must inhibit mTORC1 directly in the tumor. However, cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms could both be involved, as the vasculature may be important for increased oxygen and glucose flow to the tumors, while upregulation of translationally controlled proteins like HIF-1α may allow some of these tumors to live in hypoxic environments through glycolytic addiction.…”
Section: Implications For Rapamycin-based Cancer Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of the effect of rapamycin on tumor development, mice (10 mice per group) were exposed to the carcinogen for 16 wk, examined, and randomly distributed into treatment and control groups, which received daily i.p. injections with rapamycin (5 mg/kg/d) or an equal volume of diluent (an aqueous solution of 5.2% Tween 80 and 5.2% polyethylene glycol), respectively, as previously described (14). In this regard, recently available evidence suggests that lower doses of rapamycin may be sufficient to block mTOR activity in tumor tissues in vivo (15,16), hence suggesting that lower doses of rapamycin may be considered for future analysis in this animal model of oral cancer.…”
Section: Experimental Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%