2014
DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2014.2315716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Retina-Based Perceptually Lossless Limit and a Gaussian Foveation Scheme With Loss Control

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we propose a new limit that promises theoretically achievable data reduction ratios up to approximately 9:1 with no perceptual loss in typical scenarios. Also, we introduce a novel Gaussian foveation scheme that provides experimentally achievable gains up to approximately 2 times the compression ratio of typical compression schemes with less perceptual loss than in typical transmissions. Both the proposed limit and foveation scheme shares the same background material: a model of image p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect was not exaggerated compared with the full-spectrum conditions, as observed in a previous study ( Zhang et al, 2017 ). This discrepancy might be accounted for by the more ecologically valid retinal filter used in our study ( Targino Da Costa & Do, 2014 ), controlling for visual eccentricity. Overall, it is clear that race categorization saccadic responses were significantly faster than key press responses, even when the visual presentation paradigms were matched in terms of both visual quality and competition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect was not exaggerated compared with the full-spectrum conditions, as observed in a previous study ( Zhang et al, 2017 ). This discrepancy might be accounted for by the more ecologically valid retinal filter used in our study ( Targino Da Costa & Do, 2014 ), controlling for visual eccentricity. Overall, it is clear that race categorization saccadic responses were significantly faster than key press responses, even when the visual presentation paradigms were matched in terms of both visual quality and competition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The stimuli and procedures used in study 2 were the same as in study 1; however, a high-pass spatial filter scaled by stimulus eccentricity (8.6° from the center of the face stimuli) was applied to the foveally presented stimuli to reconstruct the loss of visual acuity observed in extrafoveal vision ( Targino Da Costa & Do, 2014 ). The scaling of the retinal filter replicated the spatial frequencies available for processing in proportion to the distance from the fovea, where the furthest areas of the face stimuli contained lower spatial frequencies than those closer to the central visual field ( Figure 2 a).…”
Section: Methods For Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used aperture sizes of 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, and 25° of visual angle. To determine the preserved information in the Gaussian aperture, Papinutto and colleagues carried out a data-driven reconstruction of the Facespan based on the convolution of a retinal filter (Targino Da Costa & Do, 2014), computation of the Structural SIMilarity index (Wang et al, 2004) and use the pixel-test (Chauvin et al, 2005;based on Random Field Theory). Their analysis showed that a 17° Gaussian aperture corresponds to 7° or 45% of the total face information being preserved.…”
Section: Sample Size Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the experiment, spotlight apertures were created in the same way as in Papinutto and colleagues (Papinutto et al, 2017) and we used aperture sizes of 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, and 25° of visual angle. Papinutto and colleagues (Papinutto et al, 2017) also carried out a data-driven reconstruction of the Facespan based on the convolution of a retinal filter (Targino Da Costa & Do, 2014), computation of the Structural SIMilarity index (Wang et al, 2004) and use the pixel-test (Chauvin et al, 2005;based on Random Field Theory) to determine the preserved information in the Gaussian aperture. Their analysis showed that a 17° Gaussian aperture corresponds to 7° or 17% of the total face information being preserved.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%