2009
DOI: 10.3336/gm.44.2.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A result in asymptotic analysis for the functional of Ginzburg-Landau type with externally imposed multiple small scales in one dimension

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we present technical improvement of results in [19]. We study asymptotic behavior of the functionalas ε −→ 0, where a is 1 × 1-periodic. We determine (rescaled) minimal asymptotic energy associated to J ε a,β,γ as ε −→ 0 where β, γ ≥ 0, β+γ > 0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Γ-convergence result is not available in the case p = 1, we are able to compute asymptotic energies: Theorem 2.2 If p = 1, then E α,g,per = E α∞,g0,per , where α ∞ (s) = 1 2 α(1 + g 2 (s)g 3 (−1)) 2 + 1 2 α(1 + g 2 (s)g 3 (1)) 2 . P r o o f. To begin with, we use suitable approximation of functions g 0 and g 2 by piecewise affine functions (g n 0 ) and piecewise constant functions (g n 2 ) as in [2] and [4]. First we consider the case when functions g n 0 are affine and g n 2 are constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Γ-convergence result is not available in the case p = 1, we are able to compute asymptotic energies: Theorem 2.2 If p = 1, then E α,g,per = E α∞,g0,per , where α ∞ (s) = 1 2 α(1 + g 2 (s)g 3 (−1)) 2 + 1 2 α(1 + g 2 (s)g 3 (1)) 2 . P r o o f. To begin with, we use suitable approximation of functions g 0 and g 2 by piecewise affine functions (g n 0 ) and piecewise constant functions (g n 2 ) as in [2] and [4]. First we consider the case when functions g n 0 are affine and g n 2 are constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once we have recovered asymptotic energy for every M > 0 (which follows by Theorem 3.3 in [3] and Theorem 4.17 in [2]), we can pass to the limit as M −→ +∞, getting the asymptotic energy for I ε α,gn . Then, quite in the same way as in [4], we use integration by parts to extended our results to the case of piecewise affine functions g n 0 and piecewise constant functions g n 2 . Finally, we can complete the proof as n −→ +∞ by the dominated convergence theorem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar types of perturbations of the functional of Alberti and Müller were considered in previous papers by the author (cf. [3] and [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…s ∈ (0, 1), the minimizers v ε of (1.2) for sufficiently small ε resemble a particular sawtooth function, and satisfy I ε a0 (v ε ) ≈ E 0 W (ζ)dζ. For results involving different types of lower-order terms see [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%