1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00942189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A restricted trust region algorithm for unconstrained optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To see this, we need the following lemma, which states the optimality system of (SP). This is a simple extension of the known result for problems without equality constraints; see [6].…”
Section: The Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To see this, we need the following lemma, which states the optimality system of (SP). This is a simple extension of the known result for problems without equality constraints; see [6].…”
Section: The Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In particular, it should contain the gradient line and the Newton direction or a direction of negative curvature, if it exists. This idea is expanded in the papers of Bulteau and Vial [3,4]. For a more readable proof, we state the following intermediary result as a lemma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we show that, with the approximate gradient path, the convergence results are about as strong as those obtained with the optimal path. Finally, the present analysis may serve as a framework for devising new paths that would be both easily implementable and endowed with interesting properties (BuReau and Vial [3,4]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As X^2 is positive definite, there exists a threshold value F& > 0 (we do not consider négative values of v) such that i/j k (x) is convex on Af(A), if and only if v > v k , Also by (2.5) this v k satisfies v^ <v k , By classical argument [7], [18] one can prove that the function v -> (ar* -…”
Section: The Extended Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof uses the optimality system of (SP) stated below. It is a simple extension of the known resuit for problems without equality constraints, see [7], [18]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%