A response to Mapou

Kane, Robert L; Goldstein, Gérald; Parsons, Oscar A.

doi:10.1080/01688638908400916

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the studies, neuropsychologists were instructed to describe neurological impairment (an exception is the reliability study by Brown et al, 1993). Yet, neuropsychologists frequently make other types of judgments, for example, describe cognitive strengths and weaknesses, assess capacity to work, and assess ability to care for oneself (e.g., Heinrichs, 1990; R. L. Kane, Goldstein, & Parsons, 1989;Mapou, 1988: Martell, 1992. In fact, one is likely to do neuropsychological testing in addition to a neurological exam or neuroimaging techniques, so one can relate behavior to the presence of structural and functional brain abnormalities (e.g., Benton, 1994).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Judgment research and neuropsychological assessment: A narrative review and meta-analyses.

Garb

Schramke²

1996

Psychological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors review judgment research in the area of neuropsychological assessment. Topics include the reliability and validity of judgments, the appropriateness of confidence ratings, the value of training and experience, the cognitive processes of neuropsychologists, and the use of decision aids, including automated assessment programs and statistical prediction rules. Most of the research is on reliability and validity. The results indicate that neuropsychologists frequently make reliable and moderately valid judgments. However, for several tasks, experimenters have not studied the reliability and validity of judgments.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Judgment research and neuropsychological assessment: A narrative review and meta-analyses.

Garb

Schramke²

1996

Psychological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A second issue of relevance to the future of neuropsychological assessment is the ability of neuropsychological test results to predict functioning in the “real world.” In the past, neuropsychological tests have primarily been evaluated in terms of their ability to predict the presence or location of cerebral lesions. This emphasis is largely appropriate because a test cannot be said to be a neuropsychological test if it is not sensitive to the condition of the brain (Kane, Goldstein, & Parsons, 1989). However, neuropsychologists are now frequently asked to make specific predictions about patients' abilities to function in specific environments such as work.…”

Section: With Advances In Diagnostic Capabilities Of Neuroradiologica...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychology in health care: Future directions.

Johnstone¹,

Frank²,

Belar³

et al. 1995

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The nature of health care delivery in the U.S. will change radically in the next 5 years, and the nature of psychological services provided will also change. Psychology is evolving into a primary health care profession, at least in terms of "health psychology" broadly defined. Modem clinical health psychology includes, at the minimum, rehabilitation psychology, neuropsychology, and traditional health psychology. The present article represents the views of 20 experts from this evolving area of practice and research on matters of public policy, training, and the future of psychology in health care settings.Editor's Note. Brick Johnstone and Robert G. Frank proposed the format of the current article, invited the participating authors to respond to one of the questions pertaining to the future of psychology in health care, and edited all responses.

show abstract

“…fNIRS is regarded as a viable alternative to functional MRI. 52 53 It offers the portable nature and low sensitivity to movement as well as a good resolution in both temporal and spatial domains, 54 ideal for exploring brain function of the prefrontal cortex, the place where cognition and emotion interacts 53 55 and also predicts cognitive improvement 56 57 for adult ADHD. However, there are no relevant reports on the study of brain function changes before and after CBT and medical treatment using fNIRS.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive behavioural therapy in groups for medicated adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionCognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based treatment for adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, it is still inconsistent whether a combination of CBT would have additive effects in medicated ADHD in adulthood. And if CBT would have additional effects, what kind and which dimension would CBT play a part? This study estimates the efficacy of CBT in stable medicated adult ADHD, using long-term outcomes and multidimensional evaluations.Methods and analysisIt is a two-armed, randomised controlled trial on the superiority of the efficacy of 12 weeks of CBT on medicated adult ADHD. We compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between CBT combined with medication (CBT+M) group and the medication-only (M) group, including ADHD core symptoms, emotional symptoms, executive function, self-esteem, life quality and brain function using functional near-infrared spectroscopy data. Participants are outpatients of the Peking University Sixth Hospital and those recruited online, diagnosed as adult ADHD and with stable medication treatment. We estimate ADHD core symptoms and combined symptoms at baseline (T1) and week 12 (T2), week 24 (T3), week 36 (T4) and week 48 (T5).Ethics and disseminationThis trial has been approved by the Ethics and Clinical Research Committees of Peking University Sixth Hospital and will be performed under the Declaration of Helsinki with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and a conference presentation.Trial registration numberChiCTR (ChiCTR1900021705).

show abstract

A response to Mapou

Cited by 10 publications

References 7 publications

Judgment research and neuropsychological assessment: A narrative review and meta-analyses.

Judgment research and neuropsychological assessment: A narrative review and meta-analyses.

Psychology in health care: Future directions.

Cognitive behavioural therapy in groups for medicated adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About