2002
DOI: 10.1080/1364253031000075262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A response to Maggie Turp's paper from a body psychotherapy perspective

Abstract: Whilst appreciating the quality of containment in Turp's work as a learning point for the Body Psychotherapy tradition, the author argues that Turp does not represent a psychotherapeutic way of 'working with the body'. This would require a deconstruction of the body/mind dualism inherent in much psychotherapeutic (and psychodynamic) theory, so that the complexity of the spontaneous and reflective body/mind processes, especially in their polar extremes (body/mind dissociation -body/mind integration / 'psyche/so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors such as Rothschild (2000), Soth (2002), Staunton (2002), Shaw (2003), Totton (1998Totton ( , 2003Totton ( , 2005, Aposhyan (2004), and Marlock and Weiss (2005) have commented on the advantages of this approach for patients with MUS/psychosomatic conditions. Particularly, a number of authors draw on a long tradition of research (Shaw, 2003) and theory (Mathew, 1998;Soth, 2002;Staunton, 2002) on the body in psychotherapy to discuss the transferential and counter-transferential issues in the therapeutic relationship. In the only randomised controlled study (Nickel et al, 2006) found bioenergetics (one technique in body psychotherapy) reduced the somatisation of symptoms experienced by Turkish immigrant men.…”
Section: Body Psychotherapymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several authors such as Rothschild (2000), Soth (2002), Staunton (2002), Shaw (2003), Totton (1998Totton ( , 2003Totton ( , 2005, Aposhyan (2004), and Marlock and Weiss (2005) have commented on the advantages of this approach for patients with MUS/psychosomatic conditions. Particularly, a number of authors draw on a long tradition of research (Shaw, 2003) and theory (Mathew, 1998;Soth, 2002;Staunton, 2002) on the body in psychotherapy to discuss the transferential and counter-transferential issues in the therapeutic relationship. In the only randomised controlled study (Nickel et al, 2006) found bioenergetics (one technique in body psychotherapy) reduced the somatisation of symptoms experienced by Turkish immigrant men.…”
Section: Body Psychotherapymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is my belief that including the body in the practice cannot merely remain a theoretical conceptualisation. It calls for adjustments of clinical practices and methodologies as well, including the reconsideration of touch and other unmediated somatic interventions (Asheri, ; Rolef Ben‐Shahar, ; Sinason, ; Soth, ; Totton, ). Otherwise, we continue to adhere to the culture of corsets, beautiful – but dissociating and limiting of life expression.…”
Section: The Perfect Consumerist Body – Forever Youngmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piensa que el self no es un constructo mental, sino un hecho corporal y, más allá, opina que estar en contacto con el self equivale a ser consciente de los afectos y estar en contacto inmediato con ellos. Recientemente, desde la perspectiva de la psicología somática, Soth (2002) ha afirmado que los fundamentos del self están constituidos por la relación recíproca entre los procesos psicológicos y corporales. Cree que la "consciencia subjetiva de mí mismo tiene sus raíces en las sensaciones físicas, impulsos, movimientos y procesos que contribuyen a generar mi sentido de identidad [...]" (p. 126).…”
unclassified