1984
DOI: 10.2307/3332634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Response to Best on Art and Sport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…interested" experience such that a reciprocity between the two fields was not interrogated. While some theorists such as Reid (1970), Kupfer (2001), Best (1974Best ( , 1978Best ( , 1986, Wertz (1984), Welsch (2005) and others did engage with the question "Is sport art?" and deduced various answers, the question itself is flawed somewhat as it assumes that a kind of "essence" pertains to both.…”
Section: The Neglect Of Everyday Aesthetics and Toward A New Interprementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…interested" experience such that a reciprocity between the two fields was not interrogated. While some theorists such as Reid (1970), Kupfer (2001), Best (1974Best ( , 1978Best ( , 1986, Wertz (1984), Welsch (2005) and others did engage with the question "Is sport art?" and deduced various answers, the question itself is flawed somewhat as it assumes that a kind of "essence" pertains to both.…”
Section: The Neglect Of Everyday Aesthetics and Toward A New Interprementioning
confidence: 99%
“…My task then is to show how art-related aesthetics can be useful to explain and develop sport theory in a new way. "New" in the sense that an affinity between the two is described and argued for, although this has been somewhat developed in the recent past in the 1970s and 1980s triggered by Reid (1970), Kupfer (2001), Best (1979Best ( , 1986, Best (1979), Wertz (1984) and Cordner (1988). My intention or contribution is, unlike these writers, not a concern with the question whether sport is art, but simply developing a theoretical framework that motivates the theoretical overlap between art-related aesthetics and sport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 William J. Bennett, past chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and now Secretary of Education, has voiced a vigorous attack on American higher education for the deplorable condition of humanistic studies and teaching.2 Both the force of the criticisms and Bennett's unique position in the political-cultural world have made To Reclaim a Legacy a subject for considerable debate both inside educational circles and without. That a firm grounding in the humanities is the proper basis of a university education is a traditional verity.…”
Section: The Humanities and The Failure Of American Higher Education:mentioning
confidence: 99%