2010
DOI: 10.1080/13588260903094392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A response surface approach to front-car optimisation for minimising pedestrian head injury levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in HIC values between the child and the adult especially for the first case is notable. This is expected as similar findings were reported in literature [3,30], thus, indicating a multiobjective optimisation strategy. However, in this work, combined optimisation (C-Opt) is employed (n ¼ 50).…”
Section: Unconstrained Optimisationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in HIC values between the child and the adult especially for the first case is notable. This is expected as similar findings were reported in literature [3,30], thus, indicating a multiobjective optimisation strategy. However, in this work, combined optimisation (C-Opt) is employed (n ¼ 50).…”
Section: Unconstrained Optimisationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Typically, some reasonable amount of error is expected due to the highly non-linear nature of the crash scenario owing to the numerous possibility of the pedestrian post impact fall pattern [3,30]. Thus an allowance is made where a practical error margin of AE100 HIC is given when judging the acceptability of the response surface models in comparison to the observed values of the HIC.…”
Section: Unconstrained Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, pedestrian accident could be reduced by achieving a shared traffic safety culture (Dula & Galler, 2007), that is increasing the awareness of risks and willingness to prevent injuries for all road users (Ek, Akselsson, Arvidsson, & Johansson, 2007). Secondly, pedestrian protection could be enhanced by designing front-end car geometry that minimizes the injury outcomes (van Hoof, de Lange, & Wismans, 2003; Zhao, Rosala, Campean, & Day, 2010). Finally, administrations could promote policies and standards to increase the intuitiveness of road signage and the pedestrian’s awareness of the traffic flow condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of Multi-body (MB) modelling technique, though initially developed for studying the gross motion of occupant models during vehicle impact, has evolved to include pedestrian models as well [11]. The advantage of fast modelling and processing speed coupled with model simplicity, despite some limitations in its application, has enabled more exhaustive multi-parametric optimization studies to be carried out [12][13][14]. Nevertheless, some drawbacks such as the non-deformable nature of the models, curtail the broader application of the exclusive usage of this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%