A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism

Abstract

This paper develops a resource-based—knowledge-based—theory of the firm. Its thesis is that the organizational mode through which individuals cooperate affects the knowledge they apply to business activity. We focus on the polar cases of organization within a firm as compared to market contracting. There will be a difference in the knowledge that is brought to bear, and hence in joint productivity, under the two options. Thus, as compared to opportunism-based, transaction-cost theory, we advance a separate (yet complementary) answer to the question: why do firms exist? Our aim is to develop an empirically relevant and complementary theory of why firms are formed: a theory based on irreducible knowledge differences between individuals rather than the threat of purposeful cheating or withholding of information. We assume limited cognitive abilities on the part of individuals (bounded rationality), and assume that opportunistic behavior will not occur. The latter allows us to determine whether resource-based theory has independent force, as compared to the opportunism-based, transaction-cost approach. The paper predicts choice of organizational mode, identifying whether firm organization or market contracting will result in the more valuable knowledge being applied to business activity. The resource-based predictions of organizational mode are compared and contrasted with corresponding opportunism-based, transaction-cost ones. A principal point is that knowledge-based considerations can outweigh opportunism-related ones. The paper also establishes the relation of a theory of the firm to a theory of performance differences between competing firms.

Assessing Determinants on Job Creation at the Firm Level: Swedish Micro Firm Data

“…The term 'resources' has, in accordance with the relevant literature, a broad meaning, consisting of all types of assets, such as cash, debt capital, management capabilities, networking, organizational processes, firm attributes, information and knowledge (Conner & Prahalad, 1996;Wernerfelt, 1984). From the viewpoint of the resource-based approach, firms can achieve high performance in terms of various measurements, such as profitability, change in sales, and job creation, through the use of different types of resources.…”

Big data and the transformation of operations models: a framework and a new research agenda

“…Developed in reaction to the "five competitive forces" analysis (Porter, 1980), the RBV theory (Penrose, 1957;Chandler, 1977;Nelson and Winter, 1982;Prahalad and Hamel, 1990;Grant, 1991;Wernerfelt, 1995;Conner and Prahalad, 1996;Priem and Butler, 2001) has put forward the strategic relevance for firms to identify, acquire, and use resources and capabilities to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. Within the resource-based view, knowledge has been regarded as a key strategic resource (see for instance Nonaka, 1994) leading to the formulation of a knowledge-based theory where the creation and application of knowledge identify the primary rationale for the firm (Bierly et al, 2000).…”

Study of factors influencing knowledge transfer in family firms

“…Within the resources and capabilities, the resources that allow us to obtain greater competitive advantages are the intangibles, and within them the knowledge (Grant, 1996;Conner & Prahalad, 1996), especially the existing knowledge in the organization (Priem & Butler, 2001).…”