2004
DOI: 10.1093/ansci/82.4.973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A resource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, genotype by environment interactions between seasons make it difficult to select animals that have high performance in all seasons. For example, several studies have shown that selection for the best animals in good years can increase the sensitivity of animals to varying environments (Falconer, 1990;van der Waaij, 2004). This environmental sensitivity can reduce performance in poor years, which can have economic and welfare consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, genotype by environment interactions between seasons make it difficult to select animals that have high performance in all seasons. For example, several studies have shown that selection for the best animals in good years can increase the sensitivity of animals to varying environments (Falconer, 1990;van der Waaij, 2004). This environmental sensitivity can reduce performance in poor years, which can have economic and welfare consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…different pathogen challenge, nutrient availability or diet composition) affect nutrient intake and allocation and consequently also the observable phenotypes related to health, reproduction and production (e.g. van der Waaij et al, 2000;van der Waaij, 2004;Vagenas et al, 2007aVagenas et al, , 2007bVagenas et al, and 2008Doeschl-Wilson et al, 2008 and2009a). In particular, the models aim to shed light on the ongoing debate about how genetic selection influences the relationship between disease resistance and (re-) production ( Knap and Bishop, 2000;Houdijk and Bü nger, 2006;DoeschlWilson et al, 2009b).…”
Section: Category 2: Models That Consider the Impact Of Infection On mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described by van der Waaij et al (2000) and van der Waaij (2004), it is possible to assess the consequences of genetic selection on the animal's ability to cope with infectious challenge with models that do not include explicit expressions for host-pathogen interactions. Representing host-pathogen interactions simply by the extent to which genotypes for production and fitness can be realised (with high infectious pressure corresponding to low realised production), van der Waaij et al (2000) showed that selection for observed production could result in increased disease resistance when animals are exposed to constant infection pressure.…”
Section: Category 2: Models That Consider the Impact Of Infection On mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The allocation of nutrients towards maintenance, growth and immune processes is often thought to be one of the key driving forces that determines the relationship between production performance and resistance e.g. [8,15,29], as it may lead to a trade-off between growth and immunity. A previous model assumed an allocation of available nutrients to immunity and performance traits in proportion to their requirements [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%