2022
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2022.3156269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Residual Movement Classification Based User Interface for Control of Assistive Devices by Persons With Complete Tetraplegia

Abstract: Complete tetraplegia can deprive a person of hand function. Assistive technologies may improve autonomy but needs for ergonomic interfaces for the user to pilot these devices still persist. Despite the paralysis of their arms, people with tetraplegia may retain residual shoulder movements. In this work we explored these movements as a mean to control assistive devices. Methods: We captured shoulder movement with a single inertial sensor and, by training a support vector machine based classifier, we decode such… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient control. 3 command modalities have been proposed to participants to control the triggering of hand opening and 2 different grasping: (1) they could perform different movements with their contralateral shoulder that were captured with inertial sensors (IMU) 44 ; (2) they could use two different muscles voluntary contractions, again from the contralateral side, that were captured by electromyography (EMG) sensors; or (3) they could push buttons attached to the wheelchair headrest with head movements. P1 chose to use small voluntary contractions of the supralesional platysma and upper trapezius muscles (of the contralateral side of the stimulated hand) detected by surface EMG (Trigno™ Delsys, Natick, MA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patient control. 3 command modalities have been proposed to participants to control the triggering of hand opening and 2 different grasping: (1) they could perform different movements with their contralateral shoulder that were captured with inertial sensors (IMU) 44 ; (2) they could use two different muscles voluntary contractions, again from the contralateral side, that were captured by electromyography (EMG) sensors; or (3) they could push buttons attached to the wheelchair headrest with head movements. P1 chose to use small voluntary contractions of the supralesional platysma and upper trapezius muscles (of the contralateral side of the stimulated hand) detected by surface EMG (Trigno™ Delsys, Natick, MA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined approaches with functional surgery may be also a solution, in particular for elbow flexion recovery 8 . Further researches are necessary to keep the solution simple with hidden complexity of the technology and richer interfaces 44,45 .…”
Section: Guided Tuning Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, in this study we considered only EMG signal for intent detection of the shoulder but the use of load cell and inertial data, in conjunction with myoelectric signal, has been yet reported [12], [37], [38], [39] and thus fusing information coming from other sensors can represent a viable solution for improving the overall performances of the proposed architecture [40].…”
Section: Additional Points and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%