2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-020-01142-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A residual a posteriori error estimate for the time–domain boundary element method

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting MOT schemes are described in [5]. They can be combined into a stable scheme for the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator S from (14), with σ = 0, using the representation…”
Section: Algorithmic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting MOT schemes are described in [5]. They can be combined into a stable scheme for the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator S from (14), with σ = 0, using the representation…”
Section: Algorithmic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide a key example for efficient approximations of the solution of transient wave equations by time-independent, adapted meshes. Such meshes also arise in adaptive algorithms based on time-integrated a posteriori error estimates [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current work provides a first, rigorous step towards efficient boundary elements for dynamic contact. Future work will focus on the a posteriori error analysis, which is essential for adaptive mesh refinements to resolve the singularities of the solution in space and time [25], as well as on stabilized mixed space-time formulations [8,12]. For applications to traffic noise [9], also the nonsmooth variational inequalities for frictional contact will be of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both stationary and dynamic contact, the relevance of adaptive methods to approximate the non-smooth solutions is well-known [29,38,46]. Recent advances in the a posteriori error analysis and resulting adaptive mesh refinement procedures for time domain boundary elements [25,26] will therefore be of interest for the dynamic contact considered here, with a particular view towards tire dynamics [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the different choices of ansatz and test functions for MOT schemes may lead to instabilities. Proper Galerkin methods are not only provably stable, but they have also attracted interest from at least three different perspectives: Rigorous a posteriori error estimates give rise to efficient adaptive mesh refinement procedures [11,15,16,17,20,25]; non-polynomial basis functions and efficient assembly of the algebraic system [21,25,24]; formulations based on the physical energy [2,3,4]. In this context, efficient preconditioners have been of current interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%