2019
DOI: 10.1163/1568539x-00003547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A resident-nepotistic-tolerant dominance style in wild white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica)?

Abstract: Dominance relationships imply consistent asymmetries in social relationships. Socioecological models predict that resource distribution determines the mode of competition that animals will face and, ultimately, the nature of their social relationships. Here, we provide the first systematic investigation of dominance style in white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica). Coatis live in cohesive female-resident groups, and have a diet based on clumped (fruits) and dispersed (insects) food items, which are predicted to favo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 104 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underlying socioecological model was originally developed for non-human primates (Wrangham 1980), and subsequently extended to include risks of predation and infanticide (van Schaik 1989;Sterck et al 1997). More recently, the extended model has also been tested in non-primates, such as coatis and ungulates (de la O et al 2019;Szemán et al 2021). Yet critiques of this model have suggested that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable (Thierry 2008(Thierry , 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying socioecological model was originally developed for non-human primates (Wrangham 1980), and subsequently extended to include risks of predation and infanticide (van Schaik 1989;Sterck et al 1997). More recently, the extended model has also been tested in non-primates, such as coatis and ungulates (de la O et al 2019;Szemán et al 2021). Yet critiques of this model have suggested that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable (Thierry 2008(Thierry , 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%