A Research Study to Measure the Efficacy of Terminating Cervical Cancer via Customized Optimum Pathway

Abstract

Background. To develop a precise prognostic model of overall survival in patients with terminating cervical cancer based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. Methods. The patients were retrieved from SEER data who are diagnosed with terminating cervical cancer from 2004 to 2016. The data were performed using univariate and multivariate analyses and constructed nomograms for predicting survival. Use C-index to validate the model accuracy. Results. Totally 15839 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer were independently allocated into the training set (n = 11088) and validation set (n = 4751). The multivariate analysis results indicated that age, race, stage_T, stage_M, and stage_N were confirmed as independent risk predictors, and those factors are applied to construct this clinical model. The C-index of overall survival in the training set was 0.6816 (95% confidence intervene (CI), 0.694–0.763) and that in the validation set was 0.6931(95% CI, 0.613–0.779). All calibration curves of various factors were consistent with predicted and actual survival. Conclusion. The nomogram provides a novel method for predicting the survival of patients with terminating cervical cancer, assisting in accurate therapeutic methods for patients with primary terminating cervical cancer.

Retracted: A Research Study to Measure the Efficacy of Terminating Cervical Cancer via Customized Optimum Pathway

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”