2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00451.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A research process for integrating Indigenous and scientific knowledge in cultural landscapes: principles and determinants of success in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, Australia

Abstract: It is widely accepted that Indigenous ecological knowledge (IEK) is potentially valuable for maintaining biodiversity within linked social-ecological systems, and cultural landscapes in particular. However, IEK is declining globally, along with biodiversity. Adaptive co-management frameworks incorporating both Indigenous and scientific knowledge systems have the capacity for greater success than frameworks embedded within a singular world view. A major challenge exists, however, in identifying pathways for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, there could be a greater role for seed funding and open‐ended funding options to support the kind of action research that emphasises cooperative or collaborative problem‐framing and interactive scoping of projects, without the requirement for community organisations to contribute funds. A number of studies nominate the joint design of projects as a critical determinant of success in participatory projects involving indigenous people, at least (Cullen‐Unsworth et al ., , see also Casteldon et al ., ). Moreover, by valuing ‘slow research’, institutions will be better equipped to support the generation of long‐term commitments to participatory practices (mrs kinpaisby, ; Conlon et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, there could be a greater role for seed funding and open‐ended funding options to support the kind of action research that emphasises cooperative or collaborative problem‐framing and interactive scoping of projects, without the requirement for community organisations to contribute funds. A number of studies nominate the joint design of projects as a critical determinant of success in participatory projects involving indigenous people, at least (Cullen‐Unsworth et al ., , see also Casteldon et al ., ). Moreover, by valuing ‘slow research’, institutions will be better equipped to support the generation of long‐term commitments to participatory practices (mrs kinpaisby, ; Conlon et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process described in the preceding followed the essential elements of participatory action research advocated by Saija (2013) and Cullen-Unsworth et al (2012), among others. Realizing that equal power relations are difficult to achieve in rural settings such as Ncera (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process involves joint problem definition and identification and is characterized by equality between researchers and local people, constant reflection on the process and outcomes, mutual trust, and accessible and open communication (Cullen-Unsworth et al 2012). It enables communities to understand an issue or concern and take action to address it, which can empower people (Raymond and Cleary 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhances the capacity of resource management organizations to respond proactively to uncertainty. Can contribute to trans-generational transfer of local knowledge through youth engagement [37]. Enables collaborators to develop a shared cross-cultural understanding of the research [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive Co-Management and Cooperative Research (utilised in many SIDS especially in the Pacific and Caribbean regions) [35][36][37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%