2002
DOI: 10.1053/hanthe.2002.v15.0153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A research agenda for Hand Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theme was surprising, as therapists have previously indicated cumulative trauma disorders as a high priority on the research agenda of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theme was surprising, as therapists have previously indicated cumulative trauma disorders as a high priority on the research agenda of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, no study examines the effectiveness of immobilization of custom and prefabricated splints as compared to casting. The American Hand Therapy Foundation cites the study by MacDermid et al (2002), which identified research priorities for the field of hand therapy. The panel of experts concluded that determining the effectiveness of therapeutic techniques and interventions was necessary.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions has been consistently identified as a high priority by the profession and its special interest groups. For example, 401 hand therapists in the United States identified an urgent need for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effectiveness of hand therapy interventions (MacDermid et al, 2002). In the United Kingdom, a survey of research priorities in mental health confirmed that evidence of effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions (particularly the core areas using activity and occupation) remains an important theme (Fowler & Hyde, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%