1966
DOI: 10.1037/h0023297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reputation test of personality integrations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies particularly concerned with this aspect of mental health and personality integration are those by 8 Duncan (1966) and Seeman (1966). Administering basically the same treatment condition to two different subject pools (men and women) the authors found that those who were selected by peers for high behavioral competence also received high scores on self concept.…”
Section: It Is Importantmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Two studies particularly concerned with this aspect of mental health and personality integration are those by 8 Duncan (1966) and Seeman (1966). Administering basically the same treatment condition to two different subject pools (men and women) the authors found that those who were selected by peers for high behavioral competence also received high scores on self concept.…”
Section: It Is Importantmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies by Duncan (1966), Wright (1966) and Seeman (1966) have supported the validity of Duncan's scale. An investigation by Wright (1967a) demonstrated the test-retest stability of this measure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The procedure for selecting personality integrated and control groups required relatively large groups of people who had known each other well for a long time (see discussion of Personality Integration Reputation Test, Duncan, 1966). It was important that the selected groups differ in value orientation, which would be empirically investigated.…”
Section: Samples and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final groups of personality integration and control group participants were selected from larger, preexisting groups at each of the institutions. These selections were based on results of the Personality Integration Reputation Test (PIRT) peer nomination procedure (Duncan, 1966). The preexisting groups included members of companies at the military academy, residents of dormitories at the seminary, and members of fraternity houses at the university.…”
Section: Samples and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation