2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A representative survey of the dynamics and energetics of FRII radio galaxies

Abstract: We report the first large, systematic study of the dynamics and energetics of a representative sample of FRII radio galaxies with well-characterized group/cluster environments. We used X-ray inverse-Compton and radio synchrotron measurements to determine the internal radio-lobe conditions, and these were compared with external pressures acting on the lobes, determined from measurements of the thermal X-ray emission of the group/cluster. Consistent with previous work, we found that FRII radio lobes are typicall… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

31
129
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
31
129
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamical model based equipartition factors are also in good agreement with the 3C observations of Ineson et al (2017) on a source-by-source basis. These measurements are all consistent to within the 2σ uncertainties, as shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: Lobe Magnetic Field Strengthsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The dynamical model based equipartition factors are also in good agreement with the 3C observations of Ineson et al (2017) on a source-by-source basis. These measurements are all consistent to within the 2σ uncertainties, as shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: Lobe Magnetic Field Strengthsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The general consensus is thus of FR-II lobes with field strengths approximately a factor two to three less than the equipartition value, or equivalently magnetic field energy densities approximately a factor of 40 less than that in the electrons. The similarity between our dynamical model equipartition factor estimates and those of Ineson et al (2017) is encouraging, however all but a single source (3C427.1) have dynamical equipartition factors fitted in the narrow range 0.32 < B/B eq < 0.42. The veracity of our fitting algorithm is further tested against observations of Pictor A, which has a measured equipartition factor of ∼0.7 (Hardcastle et al 2016).…”
Section: Lobe Magnetic Field Strengthsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations