2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A report on tick burden and molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in cattle blood samples collected from four regions in Saudi Arabia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theileria annulata detected in cattle in this study was identical to previously identified genotypes from the UAE [ 27 ] and clustered with T. annulata from Italy, Pakistan and Egypt, again suggesting that the variant was widespread. The prevalence of Theileria in livestock from Oman [ 33 ] and Saudi Arabia is also comparable to our findings [ 47 ]. Furthermore, the highest prevalence of Theileria infections occur in H. anatolicum compared to H. excavatum , H. scupense and H. marginatum , suggesting that H. anatolicum may be the main vector of theileriosis [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Theileria annulata detected in cattle in this study was identical to previously identified genotypes from the UAE [ 27 ] and clustered with T. annulata from Italy, Pakistan and Egypt, again suggesting that the variant was widespread. The prevalence of Theileria in livestock from Oman [ 33 ] and Saudi Arabia is also comparable to our findings [ 47 ]. Furthermore, the highest prevalence of Theileria infections occur in H. anatolicum compared to H. excavatum , H. scupense and H. marginatum , suggesting that H. anatolicum may be the main vector of theileriosis [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, the prevalence of T. annulata in cattle has been reported in other tropical and subtropical countries as well. The prevalence of T. annulata in cattle has been reported to be 23.3% in India [ 26 ], 20% in Egypt [ 27 ], 25.4% in Algeria [ 28 ], 18.2% in Northwest China [ 29 ] and 1.9% in Saudi Arabia [ 30 ]. These differences in T. annulata infection rates are due to variations in tick control programs, habitat suitability for ticks, farm management, husbandry practices and abiotic factors of sampling sites [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key to the ticks of Yemen was published by Hoogstraal and Kaiser [21] and for Saudi Arabia by Hoogstraal et al [22]. Recent reports of ticks from the region have focused primarily on identification of species collected from domestic animals and pathogen screening [23][24][25], with a smaller number of studies on tick specimens obtained from wild hosts [26][27][28]. Importantly, to the best of our knowledge, no molecular data from ticks collected from wildlife in Saudi Arabia have been published to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%