2006
DOI: 10.1177/102425890601200417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A report from the homeland of the Ghent system: the relationship between unemployment and trade union membership in Belgium

Abstract: Introduction: is Belgium a 'Ghent country'?Belgium is one of the few post-industrialised countries in which more than half of the dependent labour force is a trade union member. Net union density even slightly increased from 53.9% in 1990 to 55.4% in 200255.4% in (Visser 2006. Union density is higher only in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. These Scandinavian countries have in common the presence of a so-called 'Ghent system'. 1 A Ghent system can be defined as state-subsidised, but voluntary unemployment insura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Belgian unions are involved in social security management by handling unemployment benefits as typical part of the 'Ghent system' (Vandaele, 2006): this contributes to the relatively high union density, particularly among agency workers, who are unionised at nearly 60% (Arrowsmith, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belgian unions are involved in social security management by handling unemployment benefits as typical part of the 'Ghent system' (Vandaele, 2006): this contributes to the relatively high union density, particularly among agency workers, who are unionised at nearly 60% (Arrowsmith, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the very beginning, the Danish version of the Ghent system differed from the Belgian model. Wage earners were not forced to join a UIF controlled by a union in the original Belgian model, but had the opportunity to enrol in a public‐controlled UIF managed by the local city council (Vandaele, 2005; 2006). In addition, UIFs controlled by the trade unions in the Belgian model were in fact interdisciplinary from the beginning, which meant that they were able to organise members across different trades and sectors, creating a state of competition among them.…”
Section: Political Institutional Changes and New Trajectories For Unimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also important differences between the two countries. Whereas trade union membership in the Netherlands is relatively low, and on the decline, Belgium has, because of its “quasi Ghent system” of unemployment insurance and its trade union representatives on the shop floor, a relatively stable and quite high trade union density rate (Ebbinghaus & Visser, ; Vandaele, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%