A remote sensing spatio-temporal framework for interpreting sparse indicators in highly variable arid landscapes

Abstract

a b s t r a c tThe world's extensive and often remote arid landscapes are receiving increasing attention to maintain their ecological and productive values. Monitoring and management of these lands requires indicators and evidence of ecosystem condition and trend, generally derived from widely distributed and infrequently repeated site-based records. However adequate geographic representation and frequent site revisits are difficult to achieve because of the remoteness and vast extent of these landscapes. Interpreting such sparse ecological indicators is difficult, particularly within landscapes that are highly variable in space and time. To interpret ecological indicator data collected in such environments long-term patterns of natural landscape variability need to be understood. This paper presents a framework of landscape spatio-temporal variability within which to interpret ecological indicator data. This framework is based on long-term patterns of vegetation growth across the Australian arid zone, derived from twenty-five years of high temporal resolution National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) satellite imagery. We present a case study of the extensive Alinytjara Wilurara (AW) Natural Resource Management (NRM) region in far western South Australia to illustrate new insights about landscape function gained from this approach, and their implications for collection and interpretation of ecological indicator data. We illustrate how variability in vegetation response is expressed across the region, and how stratification based on active vegetation response differs from more commonly used biogeographic stratifications in this region. Lastly we demonstrate the unique patterns of long-term vegetation response for the major vegetation response classes. Average amount, seasonality, magnitude, timing and variability of vegetation response over time are used to characterise the natural "envelope" of variability of the new landscape classes.The study region showed low vegetation response in summer and higher response in winter. Onset of growth was earlier in the north and in ecosystems dominated by mallee vegetation. Cyclonic influence from the west was evident at the southern margin of the study region. The study demonstrates the landscape functional response of the study region, and presents a method whereby remote sensing reveals the landscape context within which to better interpret ecological indicator data collected in a highly variable landscape.

Assessing spatiotemporal eco-environmental vulnerability by Landsat data

“…Natural ecosystem and ecoenvironmental vulnerability are sensitive to changes in land use/land cover (LULC) (Boori and Amaro, 2011;Xie et al, 2013;Hao and Ren, 2009;Adger, 2006;Valipour, 2015Valipour, , 2016. Decision makers are increasingly pressured with challenges of pursuing social and economic developments without causing detrimental impact on the environment (Hinkel, 2011;Ostendorf, 2011;Lawley et al, 2016). While there might have strong correlations among eco-environmental health, LULC, and thermal signatures (Strand et al, 2010).…”

A monitoring toolkit for banksia woodlands: comparison of different scale methods to measure recovery of vegetation after fire

“…() used Landsat time series data, similar to that used here, to predict vegetation structure using magnitude and duration of the greatest disturbance, the time since disturbance and current index value, and a similar approach was used to understand vegetation patterns in arid areas (Lawley et al. ).…”

High Resolution Forest Masking for Seasonal Monitoring with a Regionalized and Colourimetrically Assisted Chorologic Typology

“…Computationally, regionalisation also reduces the data to be processed, as well as the spectral variability and analytical complexity per dataset. Regionalisation should be created at characteristic spatial-temporal scales that recognise both landscape variation and key ecological processes over time [45]. Venkatappa et al [46] identified phenological periods from time series curves that displayed optimal separations in vegetation index values of land cover classes.…”