2001
DOI: 10.1007/s006070170028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Remarkable Example of Catastrophic Cancellation Unraveled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problems in the more extreme tail areas are easier to detect because the complementation will cause “catastrophic” cancellation error [5], resulting in a tail area of zero, which is a much clearer signal that something is amiss than an answer that may appear similar to what was expected. This creates a somewhat counter-intuitive situation where inaccuracies in more extreme tail areas (larger exponent) are more obvious than those in less extreme tail areas (smaller exponent).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems in the more extreme tail areas are easier to detect because the complementation will cause “catastrophic” cancellation error [5], resulting in a tail area of zero, which is a much clearer signal that something is amiss than an answer that may appear similar to what was expected. This creates a somewhat counter-intuitive situation where inaccuracies in more extreme tail areas (larger exponent) are more obvious than those in less extreme tail areas (smaller exponent).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rounding errors propagate and compound when a result from one floating point operation is used in further computations. For this reason, expressions of the form ( a + b ) ‐ b may evaluate to 0 for a sufficiently small a ≠ 0 and large b ; a phenomena known as catastrophic cancellation (CC) [CVBK01]. We will show how this impacts any pipeline utilizing matrix multiplications or vector additions.…”
Section: Theoretical Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example shows that the arithmetic of large numbers should be performed very cautiously in scientific computing. A detailed numerical analysis of this catastrophic behavior of rounding errors is presented in [3] and [10]. Thus, we should keep in mind that a very small number of subtractions and roundings (see (5) and (8)) may completely destroy the exact solution [17].…”
Section: Rump's Examplementioning
confidence: 99%