1968
DOI: 10.1016/s1385-7258(68)50016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Remark on Uniformly Distributed Sequences and Riemann Integrability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Below Theorem 2.7 in Chapter 1 of [17], Krengel mentions that Weyl's theorem is sometimes spelled out for to the class of Riemann-integrable functions. Actually, it was proved by de Bruijn and Post [7] that the function is Riemann-integrable if and only if the convergence is uniform. This also follows from our next proposition.…”
Section: Uniform Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below Theorem 2.7 in Chapter 1 of [17], Krengel mentions that Weyl's theorem is sometimes spelled out for to the class of Riemann-integrable functions. Actually, it was proved by de Bruijn and Post [7] that the function is Riemann-integrable if and only if the convergence is uniform. This also follows from our next proposition.…”
Section: Uniform Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a considerable problem even for d = 1: The left-hand side only depends on countably many values of f , so any notion of integrability which is preserved under changing f at countably many points is inevitably too weak to keep the conclusion of the theorem intact. There is a clarifying No-Go Theorem: Given any Lebesgue-integrable function f : [0, 1] → R which does not admit a Riemann-integrable representative, there must exist a uniformly distributed sequence (t n ) such that Equation 5.1 fails [dBP68].…”
Section: Equidistribution Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singular integrands cannot be BVHK; they cannot even be Riemann integrable. It is known since [6] and [3] that for any integrand f on [0, 1] d that is not Riemann integrable, there exists a sequence x x x i ∈ [0, 1] d for which the star discrepancy D * n (x x x 1 , . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%