Integers 2014
DOI: 10.1515/9783110298161.714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Remark on Relatively Prime Sets

Abstract: Four functions counting the number of subsets of {1, 2, . . . , n} having particular properties are defined by Nathanson and generalized by many authors. They derive explicit formulas for all four functions. In this paper, we point out that we need to compute only one of them as the others will follow as a consequence. Moreover, our method is simpler and leads to more general results than those in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see from (10) that the main terms can be obtained from the small value of d. Expanding the sum for d = 1, 2, 3, 4, we obtain…”
Section: Partial Sums and Limitsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We see from (10) that the main terms can be obtained from the small value of d. Expanding the sum for d = 1, 2, 3, 4, we obtain…”
Section: Partial Sums and Limitsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The functions f (n) and Φ (n) are introduced by Nathason [8] and generalized by many authors [2,3,9,11,12,15]. We refer the reader to Pongsriiam's article ( [9] or [10]) for a unified approach and the shortest calculation of the formulas for f (n), Φ (n) and their generalizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%