1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-65895-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Remark on default risk models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
155
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the case of the models of Kusuoka (1999), Jarrow & Yu (2001), Yu (2007), where the intensities are affine functions of the default indicators 4 .…”
Section: Intensity Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case of the models of Kusuoka (1999), Jarrow & Yu (2001), Yu (2007), where the intensities are affine functions of the default indicators 4 .…”
Section: Intensity Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such setups arise, e.g., in the presence of counterparty risk (as in Kusuoka (1999) and Jarrow and Yu (2001)) or contagion (as in Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Helwege (2003)). …”
Section: Default Risk Premiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Cases in which the doubly stochastic setting no longer holds are studied in Duffie, Schroder, and Skiadas (1996), Kusuoka (1999), Jarrow and Yu (2001), Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Helwege (2003) and to the assumption inherent in the Cox process setup that the filtration generated by the default components is conditionally independent of the default event, there do not exist feedback effects from the default time into the default components to be considered in the valuation.…”
Section: Default Risk Premiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before the proposition, the fact that the default time depends on the value of the defaultable security forces us to construct τ, P, and S simultaneously. In order to do so, we rely on a change of measure argument similar to that of Kusuoka (1999). More precisely, we start from an exogenously specified probability measure under which the intensity of the default time is constant, then construct the value process S, and finally define P by a suitably chosen equivalent change of probability measure.…”
Section: Recursive Valuation Of Defaultable Securitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a third example, we revisit the counterparty credit risk model that was first investigated by Jarrow and Yu (2001), henceforth (JY), and Kusuoka (1999).…”
Section: Counterparty Credit Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%