2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.01.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reliable liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of multiple mycotoxins in fresh fish and dried seafoods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that within the wide‐testing concentration range of each analyte, a good linear relationship existed, with coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) between 0.9992 (AFG 1 and OTA) and 0.9997 (AFG 2 ). In general, nice and satisfactory sensitivities were obtained with LODs varying from 0.031 to 2.5 μg/kg and LOQs in the range of 0.078–6.25 μg/kg for all the seven analytes, which are obviously better than the sensitivities of the previously established methods for determination of multiple mycotoxins in Lentinula edodes , fish, seafood, and egg samples .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The results showed that within the wide‐testing concentration range of each analyte, a good linear relationship existed, with coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) between 0.9992 (AFG 1 and OTA) and 0.9997 (AFG 2 ). In general, nice and satisfactory sensitivities were obtained with LODs varying from 0.031 to 2.5 μg/kg and LOQs in the range of 0.078–6.25 μg/kg for all the seven analytes, which are obviously better than the sensitivities of the previously established methods for determination of multiple mycotoxins in Lentinula edodes , fish, seafood, and egg samples .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In previous literature [39,40], often an additional matrix-matched calibration experiment was required to evaluate matrix effect. However, due to the extremely complex and varying interferences in different cereals, this method is not appropriate any more.…”
Section: Matrix Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical methods for determination of mycotoxins have been reviewed [10,11], among them liquid chromatographic (LC) coupled with various detectors (e.g. fluorescent or tandem mass spectrometry detector) are the most widely used methods at present [12][13][14][15][16], in particular, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS 2 ) is recognized as the "gold standard" approach for mycotoxin analysis due to the natural advantages of its high sensitivity and selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instrumental methods produce sensitive and reliable results but they are laborious, costly and conducted in a sequential manner, making them unsuitable for routine analysis of large scale of samples [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%