2020
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.11983845
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reliable and Accurate Solution to the Induced Fit Docking Problem for Protein-Ligand Binding

Abstract: We present a reliable and accurate solution to the induced fit docking problem for protein-ligand binding by combining ligand-based pharmacophore docking (Phase), rigid receptor docking (Glide), and protein structure prediction (Prime) with explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations. We provide an in-depth description of our novel methodology and present results for 41 targets consisting of 415 cross-docking cases divided amongst a training and test set. For both the training and test-set, we compute bind… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Free G4 structures often do not resemble the bound G4 structures because flexible flanking and loop regions adopt different arrangements upon ligand binding, as shown for the binding of epiberberine to a non-parallel telomeric G4 structure [ 47 ]. Docking against such a ligand-induced bound conformation needs to consider receptor rearrangement, which is a major challenge and an active area of research [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free G4 structures often do not resemble the bound G4 structures because flexible flanking and loop regions adopt different arrangements upon ligand binding, as shown for the binding of epiberberine to a non-parallel telomeric G4 structure [ 47 ]. Docking against such a ligand-induced bound conformation needs to consider receptor rearrangement, which is a major challenge and an active area of research [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are more than 60 docking programs [36] and some of them like AutoDock [37], DOCK [38], AutoDock Vina [39], GalaxyDock [40], and FITTED [41] can incorporate protein flexibility into docking, although this is typically is limited to sidechain motions in the binding pocket. In addition, there are approaches that incorporate protein flexibility using a larger set of protein conformations that are generated either beforehand ("ensemble docking") [42,43,34] or on-the-fly ("induced fit docking") [33,44,45]. Boltzmann docking [46] and Implicit Ligand Theory [47] are also used to dock ligands to an ensemble of protein conformations, however these ensembles are generated in the apo structure and would not easily capture pocket conformations that are induced by the presence of a ligand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Table 1, native Glide SP delivers considerably higher enrichment over the DUD-E dataset using holo structures as compared to the enrichments reported in the study of Im and coworkers 25 , where AutoDock 21 was used to generate the docked poses. Next, we use our recently released induced-fit docking program (IFD-MD) 26,27 to induce a more holo-like structure suitable for docking using the holo ligand provided in the DUD-E dataset and repeat the docking calculations on this structure. IFD-MD is a rigorous, template-free physics-based protocol that combines traditional docking calculations, pharmacophore-based analysis of the active site, detailed analysis of the active site water network using WScore, side chain sampling, and MD-based refinement, to capture induced fit effects upon ligand binding 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%