2008
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2007.909774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reliability Growth Projection Model for One-Shot Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result in (20) is then updated as (37) For the prior number of failure modes used in the visual goodness of fit in Section IV, the likelihood of observing a failure mode on at least one of the systems by time is updated as (38) The expression in (28) is then modified to be (39) When comparing the observed failure modes to the prior prediction, note that the time of first occurrence for a failure mode should be the minimum of the occurrence times observed over all of the systems under test. Modifications to the chi-square test in Section IV.B are not necessary for multiple systems, as (33) and (34) can be used directly in place of (9) and (10).…”
Section: A Multiple Systems Under Testmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result in (20) is then updated as (37) For the prior number of failure modes used in the visual goodness of fit in Section IV, the likelihood of observing a failure mode on at least one of the systems by time is updated as (38) The expression in (28) is then modified to be (39) When comparing the observed failure modes to the prior prediction, note that the time of first occurrence for a failure mode should be the minimum of the occurrence times observed over all of the systems under test. Modifications to the chi-square test in Section IV.B are not necessary for multiple systems, as (33) and (34) can be used directly in place of (9) and (10).…”
Section: A Multiple Systems Under Testmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Crow also combined techniques from [12] and [16] in the popular Crow-Extended Model [19] to allow for arbitrary corrective actions. More recent work by Hall [20], [21] has dealt with reliability growth projection for discrete systems, developed in part due to the lack of modeling techniques for these types of systems. Due to the large number of potential software reliability growth models that can be used, Li, et al [22] employed adaptive boosting techniques to combine results across multiple software reliability growth models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Hall and Mosleh developed a mathematical formulation of discrete reliability growth method, which models system reliability improvement due to changes in system design after failure modes are identified during tests. The approach is based on failure on demand and its applicability to modeling software failure remains to be evaluated.…”
Section: A Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the example below, uncertainty distributions are constructed for all of the management metrics given in [18]. Note that the associated equations are derived from a shrinkage factor estimator discussed in [17], and [2]. The management metrics and associated model equations include: the expected initial reliability of the system (obtained from Equation (8) in [18]),…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%