2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reliability analysis method for fatigue design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This error can be reduced by multiplying the simulations, so as to take into account a variety of cases, but then again, the cost of simulation might be too high. To workaround the calculation time problem, it is possible to replace the detailed model by a simplified one, usually called meta-model [5].…”
Section: A Poorly Known Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This error can be reduced by multiplying the simulations, so as to take into account a variety of cases, but then again, the cost of simulation might be too high. To workaround the calculation time problem, it is possible to replace the detailed model by a simplified one, usually called meta-model [5].…”
Section: A Poorly Known Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of cracks greatly reduces the strength of the structure, resulting in fracture stress far less than the yield stress, even less than the allowable stress [2], is the root cause of fracture failure. In fatigue problems [3], fatigue load, fatigue life, fatigue crack growth rate and other data often have great randomness and dispersion. In view of the uncertainty in fatigue problems, it is necessary to analyze the crack propagation using reliability theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the variable‐amplitude loading, a fatigue damage is usually calculated from the loading spectrum, and the reliability is then calculated from the statistical distribution of the damage that is influenced by variations of the material's S‐N curve(s), loading factors, and/or loads themself . To calculate reliability from the fatigue damage, Monte‐Carlo simulations and/or FORM methods are frequently applied . Often, the influence of the loading spectrum is considered through the equivalent stress amplitude or range .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate reliability from the fatigue damage, Monte‐Carlo simulations and/or FORM methods are frequently applied . Often, the influence of the loading spectrum is considered through the equivalent stress amplitude or range . Some researcher also follow a stochastic approach to calculate damage as opposed to the application of the material's S‐N curve with scatter, but it was shown by Paolino and Cavatorte that the former approach yields in better reliability predictions only 10% of the cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%