2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A relaxation-projection method for compressible flows. Part II: Artificial heat exchanges for multiphase shocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
85
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a corollary of our Theorem 5.2, the MTT-equilibrium system defined in [10] or the Euler system provided with the EOS defined in [4,29,31,34,40,47,55] are strictly hyperbolic.…”
Section: Theorem 52 (Hyperbolicity) For Smooth Solutions the Comprmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As a corollary of our Theorem 5.2, the MTT-equilibrium system defined in [10] or the Euler system provided with the EOS defined in [4,29,31,34,40,47,55] are strictly hyperbolic.…”
Section: Theorem 52 (Hyperbolicity) For Smooth Solutions the Comprmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The archetype five-equation model is that of Kapila et al [10]. It has already found many applications, a non-exhaustive list of excellent references is [12,3,14,2,21,17]. (Recently, Saurel et al have even derived a six-equation model from a five-equation one [22].)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that allow describing the diffusion regions are divided into nonequilibrium (there is no equality of phase pressures and phase velocities) [1] and equilibrium (phases are in mechanical equilibrium) [2]. Numerical approximation for equilibrium models proves to be simpler, but in this case a number of problems arises [3]: 1) the nonmonotonic behavior of a two-phase mixture sound velocity as a function of the volume fraction, that can lead to errors in the calculation of the passage of waves across the interface; 2) non-conservative form of the equation for the volume fraction. Even using of specially obtained relations on the front of the shock wave [4], it is not always possible to achieve a coincidence between the numerical and analytical solutions, since the averaging of non-conservative variables has no physical meaning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even using of specially obtained relations on the front of the shock wave [4], it is not always possible to achieve a coincidence between the numerical and analytical solutions, since the averaging of non-conservative variables has no physical meaning. This problem was overcome in [3], using the relaxation algorithm instead of the averaging procedure. A more robust approach involves the model that is nonequilibrium only by pressure [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%