2009
DOI: 10.1134/s0202289309020042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A relativistic two-parameter core-envelope model of compact stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anisotropy ∆ is increasing in the neighbourhood of the centre, reaches a maximum value and then subsquently decreases. The profile of ∆ is similar to the Sharma and Maharaj (2007) and the Tikekar and Jotania (2009) for strange stars with quark matter.…”
Section: Physical Featuressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The anisotropy ∆ is increasing in the neighbourhood of the centre, reaches a maximum value and then subsquently decreases. The profile of ∆ is similar to the Sharma and Maharaj (2007) and the Tikekar and Jotania (2009) for strange stars with quark matter.…”
Section: Physical Featuressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Empirically, in order to design the core envelope model, the Darmois-Isreali conditions should be satisfied at the junction of the core and the envelope. With this empirical aspect, many authors [1,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] have developed stellar models, with an assumption of a core and an envelope, for highly dense relativistic objects. Eventually in most of the core-envelope solutions so far obtained have the continuity of only metric potentials and pressure at the junction of the core and the envelope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (3+1) dimensions, the Finch and Skea [2] ansatz has been found to be useful to develop physically accept-able models capable of describing realistic stars. The physical 3-space of the back ground space-time, when embedded in a 4-dimensional Euclidean space, represents a 3-paraboloid which is a departure from the 3-spherical geometry [10], [11]. Similarly, in (2 + 1) dimensions, though the space-time remains circularly symmetric, the t = constant hyper-surface of the associated background space-time becomes a parabola rather than a circle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%