2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-017-2267-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A relativistic gravity train

Abstract: A nonrelativistic particle released from rest at the edge of a ball of uniform charge density or mass density oscillates with simple harmonic motion. We consider the relativistic generalizations of these situations where the particle can attain speeds arbitrarily close to the speed of light; generalizing the electrostatic and gravitational cases requires special and general relativity, respectively. We find exact closed-form relations between the position, proper time, and coordinate time in both cases, and fi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advent of special relativity suggested a simple question: what happens to this archetypal physical system when the maximum oscillator velocity approaches the speed of light? While theories of the relativistic harmonic oscillator have been discussed for decades [1][2][3][4][5], the combination of special relativity and harmonic motion has proven resistant to physical realization. The infeasibility of realizing harmonic traps with depths on the order of a particle's rest mass energy (Boltzmann's constant times nearly six billion degrees Kelvin for an electron) has motivated work studying relativistic phenomena in disparate physical contexts, including a measurement of the Dirac oscillator spectrum in an array of microwave resonators [6] and proposals and realizations of effective relativistic effects in trapped atoms [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], trapped ions [14][15][16], photonic waveguides [17], and graphene [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advent of special relativity suggested a simple question: what happens to this archetypal physical system when the maximum oscillator velocity approaches the speed of light? While theories of the relativistic harmonic oscillator have been discussed for decades [1][2][3][4][5], the combination of special relativity and harmonic motion has proven resistant to physical realization. The infeasibility of realizing harmonic traps with depths on the order of a particle's rest mass energy (Boltzmann's constant times nearly six billion degrees Kelvin for an electron) has motivated work studying relativistic phenomena in disparate physical contexts, including a measurement of the Dirac oscillator spectrum in an array of microwave resonators [6] and proposals and realizations of effective relativistic effects in trapped atoms [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], trapped ions [14][15][16], photonic waveguides [17], and graphene [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before describing the experiments it is useful to briefly outline existing predictions for the behavior of a relativistic harmonic oscillator [1][2][3][4][5]. As the maximum velocity v max approaches c, relativistic effects are expected to modify the character of harmonic motion in several ways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[52] [53] [55] [57]. This has led to the derivation of a closed-from solution for the equation of the RHO in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions [51] [56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oscillations in the weak-relativistic limit have been of interest in Plasma Physics [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Results have been attained by either generating numerical solutions, or by expansions in powers of β 2 (β = (Max| |)/c) in the weak-relativistic limit [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Owing to the limitation of the validity in time of approximate solutions obtained by asymptotic expansion methods, typically, the lowest-order approximation ((O(β 2 )) in such analyses has a 1-2% error relative to the numerical solution only up to β ≈ 0.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%