2018
DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2018.1502921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A relational recasting of the principles of emotional competence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, whether encodings, as reflected by snap judgments, affect actual behavior, such as whether a person will share contact information is expected to depend on other factors, such as a person's goals or strategies (e.g., Lazarus, 1991;Bolger & Zuckerman, 1995;McCabe & Fleeson, 2016;Mischel et al, 1989;Zayas, Pandey, & Mischel, 2014). For example, a person's initial snap judgment of a novel other may be favorable, but if she does not expect the person to reciprocate, she may override her initial favorable snap judgments for protective reasons (e.g., von Baeyer, Sherk, & Zanna, 1981;Campos et al, 2018). Ultimately, researchers would be interested in how other aspects of the CAPS network shape or alter the initial encoding.…”
Section: What Do If… Then… Profiles Reveal About a Person?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, whether encodings, as reflected by snap judgments, affect actual behavior, such as whether a person will share contact information is expected to depend on other factors, such as a person's goals or strategies (e.g., Lazarus, 1991;Bolger & Zuckerman, 1995;McCabe & Fleeson, 2016;Mischel et al, 1989;Zayas, Pandey, & Mischel, 2014). For example, a person's initial snap judgment of a novel other may be favorable, but if she does not expect the person to reciprocate, she may override her initial favorable snap judgments for protective reasons (e.g., von Baeyer, Sherk, & Zanna, 1981;Campos et al, 2018). Ultimately, researchers would be interested in how other aspects of the CAPS network shape or alter the initial encoding.…”
Section: What Do If… Then… Profiles Reveal About a Person?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An expression sign is also defined as a tripartite structure (Holodynski & Friedlmeier, 2006, p. 67): (a) its form consisting of a pattern of nonverbal behavior such as smiling, making a fist, or a call of triumph; (b) its object, denoting the phenomenon to which the sign refers; and (c) its interpretant. What is special about expression signs compared to speech signs is that they generally point to only two kinds of objects: the feeling a person is currently experiencing and her or his current action readiness (Holodynski & Friedlmeier, 2006; Campos et al, 2018; Kottonau, 2010; Scherer & Grandjean, 2008). Speech signs, in contrast, can refer to every real or imagined object or phenomena.…”
Section: Signs and Their Significance For Emotional Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internalization model of emotional development proposes a similar internalization process for the development of expression signs (Holodynski, 2013; Campos et al, 2018). If expression signs are used only for self-regulation, then a full-fledged performance of perceivable expression signs becomes increasingly superfluous as a person becomes aware of the internal sensations these expression signs elicit.…”
Section: What Develops In Emotional Development?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In so doing, I define emotions as felt modes of engaging the world. From this perspective, emotions are dynamic syndromes of action and experience organized in terms of the relation between organism and world (Campos, Camras, Lee, He, & Campos, 2018; de Rivera & Grinkis, 1986; Fogel et al, 1992; Lazarus, 1991, 2001; Mesquita & Boiger, 2014; Scherer, 1982). Emotions self-organize through the mutual influence of processes that occur both within and between people (Lewis & Granic, 2000; Mascolo, 2013; Overton, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%