2005
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2005.17843941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Relational Perspective on Turnover: Examining Structural, Attitudinal, and Behavioral Predictors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
371
3
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(402 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
17
371
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the employee him-or herself was interpreted to be the sole responsible person for coping with difficulties associated with family responsibilities (ibidem, 1995). We therefore argue that following the previously explained relational perspective (Mossholder et al, 2005) is urgently needed in order to respond to nowadays' need for employees to combine the ever-increasing work and private life demands (De Vos & Author, 2015).…”
Section: Light Of Affective Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This implies that the employee him-or herself was interpreted to be the sole responsible person for coping with difficulties associated with family responsibilities (ibidem, 1995). We therefore argue that following the previously explained relational perspective (Mossholder et al, 2005) is urgently needed in order to respond to nowadays' need for employees to combine the ever-increasing work and private life demands (De Vos & Author, 2015).…”
Section: Light Of Affective Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Likewise, in their job embeddedness model, Mitchell, Holtom, Lee, Sablynski, and Erez (2001) proposed that a major factor inhibiting turnover is the depth and breadth of interpersonal relationships developed through contextual performance behaviors. Mossholder, Settoon, and Henagan (2005) also showed evidence that workers with fewer interpersonal ties were more likely to quit. Hence, contextual performance promotes the formal and informal connections that reduce an employee's likelihood of quitting.…”
Section: Criteria: Focal Versus Contextual Performancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The employee turnover is always expensive, detrimental and always affects the organizational performance [9]. Replacing leaving employees and selecting, recruiting and training the new ones will cost a lot of time, money and effort [10]. Reference [11] find that the relationship between total turnover and organizational performance is significant in a negative way.…”
Section: Definition Of Employee Turnover Its Sources and The Rolmentioning
confidence: 99%