A relational perspective on entrepreneurial ecosystems

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of the entrepreneurship center (EC) in the larger entrepreneurial ecosystem. Entrepreneurial ecosystems thrive because of complex interdependencies and dynamic relationships between and among its participants. While the university has often been highlighted as a key player in the entrepreneurial ecosystem, the role of the EC within the university, despite its strategically influential position in stimulating entrepreneurship, has not received sufficient attention in scholarship. Design/methodology/approach The authors attempt to address this gap in scholarship using an expert Delphi panel approach to explore the vital role that the EC plays in ensuring the vibrancy of the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. In doing so, the authors tackle the question of sustainability of the EC by outlining a structural framework and key job characteristics of the EC director so that it may thrive beyond the tenure of a transformational leader. Findings In analyzing the responses of Delphi panelists and reviewing the theoretical foundations, the authors have identified three areas for discussion: the question of whether the EC director ought to be an academic job, the key skills of an effective EC director and how to sustain the EC after the departure of a transformative leader. Considering the vital role that the EC plays in the university and regional entrepreneurial ecosystems, these questions have importance for the future of the practice of entrepreneurship. Originality/value The role of the EC in the larger regional entrepreneurial ecosystem and the impact of the EC director are subjects that have been largely unaddressed by current scholarship. This is despite the growing number of ECs, the growth of entrepreneurship as a discipline, the desire to foster entrepreneurial universities and the struggle to find suitable EC leadership talent. The EC is critical for bringing together various actors within the regional entrepreneurship ecosystem, creating and maintaining an entrepreneurial culture and fostering co-curricular learning to develop human capital, key benefits that the university provides on top of its research activity.

Who captures value from hackathons? Innovation contests with collective intelligence tools bridging creativity and coupled open innovation

“…The studied hackathons, in the case of La Mêlée, are organized in partnership with the initiator of the hackathon where La Mêlée brings its experience in organizing such events and mobilizing the entrepreneurship ecosystem through its large network. This develops new ventures (Pittz & Hertz, 2018, p. 221). La Mêlée plays an intermediary role as a boundary organization (Seravalli & Simeone, 2016).…”

From business incubator to crucible: a new perspective on entrepreneurial support

“…The performance of incubated ventures may also suffer when entrepreneurs choose to not use an incubator's service offerings because they do not understand their own needs or they face barriers in accessing them (Van Weele et al, 2017). Attention is therefore increasingly focused on understanding differences in these resource needs and preferences of early-stage entrepreneurs Van Weele and Rijnsoever, 2020), how incubation creates value for them (Nair and Blomquist, 2020; and how dyadic and relational aspects of incubation impact their support and the outcomes they achieve (Bergman and McMullen, 2021;Pittz and Hertz, 2018;Vanderstraeten et al, 2016). There is a possibility that some entrepreneurs will not be a suitable match for any particular incubator and that incubation cannot benefit them.…”

“…, 2020) and how dyadic and relational aspects of incubation impact their support and the outcomes they achieve (Bergman and McMullen, 2021; Nicholls-Nixon et al. , 2022; Pittz and Hertz, 2018; Vanderstraeten et al. , 2016).…”