2008
DOI: 10.1002/job.523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A relational demography model of workgroup identification: testing the effects of race, race dissimilarity, racial identification, and communication behavior

Abstract: SummaryThis study tested a relational demography model of workgroup identification. We theorized that early in workgroup formation, (a) racial identification would moderate the influence of racial dissimilarity on member communication behavior (frequency and length of verbal participation) during a group task, (b) member communication behaviors would mediate the effect of racial dissimilarity on workgroup identification, and that (c) these effects would be affected non-symmetrically by racial group membership … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(88 reference statements)
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underlying rationale is that individuals tend to form close association and network ties with others that are demographically similar to them; a phenomenon which researchers label 'social homophily' (see Mouw, 2006;Stewart and Garcia-Prieto, 2008), and which commonly results in the direct or indirect exclusion of demographically dissimilar work colleagues (see Avery et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discrimination and Disadvantage Of Bme Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying rationale is that individuals tend to form close association and network ties with others that are demographically similar to them; a phenomenon which researchers label 'social homophily' (see Mouw, 2006;Stewart and Garcia-Prieto, 2008), and which commonly results in the direct or indirect exclusion of demographically dissimilar work colleagues (see Avery et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discrimination and Disadvantage Of Bme Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avey et al (), in fact, found that the effects of dyadic similarity were stronger for African Americans. However, other studies found significant relationships between racial dissimilarity and unfavourable outcomes for Caucasian employees, but mostly nonsignificant effects for African Americans and other minority employees (e.g., Chattopadhyay, ; Mueller, Finley, Iverson, & Price ; Riordan & Shore, ; Stewart & Garcia‐Prieto, ; Tsui, Egan, & O'Reilly, ). These findings suggest that relational demography researchers must take into account nonsymmetrical effects.…”
Section: Perceived Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also act as a signal to underlying differences, creating an expectation that group members will disagree and lessening the impact of that disagreement when it occurs (Rink & Ellemers, 2007a). This can lead group members who have a strong racial identity, for example, to exhibit more active communication behaviour during initial interactions with diverse groups in order to avoid potential misunderstandings (Stewart & Garcia-Prieto, 2008). …”
Section: Problems Coordinating Information In Groups With Deep-level mentioning
confidence: 99%