2020
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A registry‐based algorithm to predict ejection fraction in patients with heart failure

Abstract: Aims Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is required to categorize heart failure (HF) [i.e. HF with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced (HFrEF) EF] but is often not captured in population-based cohorts or non-HF registries. The aim was to create an algorithm that identifies EF subphenotypes for research purposes. Methods and results We included 42 061 HF patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. As primary analysis, we performed two logistic regression models including 22 variables t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher PPV for HFpEF reported in our study is likely explained by addition of frequent comorbid conditions and demographics in addition to diagnoses codes. A second study by Uijl et al based on data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry used an approach similar to ours, where 22 predictors including laboratory results such as NT-proBNP, renal function; demographics such as age, sex; and comorbid conditions were used to classify patients into HFpEF and HFrEF [ 10 ]. The authors noted discrimination of 0.73 for this model in an external validation cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher PPV for HFpEF reported in our study is likely explained by addition of frequent comorbid conditions and demographics in addition to diagnoses codes. A second study by Uijl et al based on data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry used an approach similar to ours, where 22 predictors including laboratory results such as NT-proBNP, renal function; demographics such as age, sex; and comorbid conditions were used to classify patients into HFpEF and HFrEF [ 10 ]. The authors noted discrimination of 0.73 for this model in an external validation cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies attempted to develop methods to predict left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with heart failure. Some used administrative claims from Medicare [ 21 , 22 , 23 ] or a specific database such as the Swedish Heart Failure Registry [ 24 ]. For those using administrative claims, a large number of variables were used in the training sample, identified by the ICD-code.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have approached to develop methods for predicting left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with heart failure. Some have used Administrative-Claims from Medicare 21,22,23 or specific data base such is the Swedish Heart Failure Registry 24 . In those using Administrative-claims a large number of variables, have been used in the training sample, identified by the ICD-code, while the treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%