The fuel cell is currently being established as a future 'green' energy source. The direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) uses aqueous methanol solution as a fuel and has potential application in mobile electronics.[1] However, the high electrocatalyst cost and poor anode performance are two key handicaps which restrain the commercialization of DMFC. [2,3] The fabrication of low-loaded but active Pt catalysts for the anode is essential for the DMFC development. Practical approaches include 1) a decrease in the particle size (or high density of active sites) of Pt electrocatalysts, [4][5][6] 2) an increase in the accessibility of active sites for methanol, [7][8][9] and 3) a high resistance against CO poison.[10]CO is an intermediate in the oxidation of methanol [Eq. (1)] and poisons active Pt sites at the anode of DMFC:Adsorbed CO can be oxidized to poisonless CO 2 by water [Eq. (2)] at a cost of overpotential (h):The h required depends on the electrocatalysts used. [11,12] For monometallic Pt/C catalysts, a high h % 0.6 V is generally needed. Advanced electrocatalyst design relies on "bifunctional catalysts" [13][14][15] in which other metals are added to promote Equation (2). Ruthenium has been extensively explored as the best promoter. [1][2][3] A decrease of h to % 0.2 V was generally found for Pt-Ru/C bimetallic catalysts.Recently, Steigerwalt and co-workers [16] prepared a Pt-Ru/ GCNF nanocomposite (oxidized at 623 K) as the anode catalyst in a DMFC, and found a 50 % increase in the cell performance from an unsupported Pt-Ru catalyst. The enhanced performance was attributed to the existence of oxidized Ru species in the Pt-Ru/GCNF catalyst. In a previous report, [17] electroactivity of methanol oxidation with PtRu/C catalyst was also found promoted by oxidation treatments. The extent of promotion, however, depends on the temperature (T o ) of oxidation treatment. The promotion increased initially with T o value and optimized at T o = 520 K when the crystalline RuO 2 (c-RuO 2 ) phase began (seen through XRD) on the studied Pt-Ru/C catalyst. Herein, we report our experience on the reversibility between RuO 2 and Ru, during repetitive redox treatments of reduction (by hydrogen at T r = 620 K) and oxidation (by air at T o = 520 K) on a Pt-Ru/C bimetallic catalyst, and on the stability of c-RuO 2 during electrooxidation of methanol. A supported bimetallic catalyst of 11.1 wt % Pt-Ru/C (with a Pt/Ru atomic ratio of 1.0) was prepared by the method of incipient wetness impregnation.[10] The freshly impregnated catalyst was subsequently treated by the repetitive redox treatment. The treated catalysts were coded as Red m or Ox m , in which symbols Red and Ox denote the type (reduction or oxidation) of final treatment while the subscript m represents the number of repetitive treatments. For example, Red 1 presents an electrocatalyst from reduction of the freshly impregnated catalyst while Ox 2 catalyst is obtained from oxidation of catalyst Red 2 .