1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(76)91589-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reflection on partial coherence in electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low spatial frequencies are imaged with full contrast, while higher frequencies are somewhat attenuated (54). Furthermore, when this STEM annular detector is used the signal is said to be "incoherent" in the sense that each atom in the probe makes its own contribution to the signal independently of its relationship to its neighbors (18). Thus, the intensity of the large-angle annular detector signal is directly proportional to the number of atoms in the beam at any given time (weighted by their atomic number) and is essentially independent of their spatial arrangement.…”
Section: Electron Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low spatial frequencies are imaged with full contrast, while higher frequencies are somewhat attenuated (54). Furthermore, when this STEM annular detector is used the signal is said to be "incoherent" in the sense that each atom in the probe makes its own contribution to the signal independently of its relationship to its neighbors (18). Thus, the intensity of the large-angle annular detector signal is directly proportional to the number of atoms in the beam at any given time (weighted by their atomic number) and is essentially independent of their spatial arrangement.…”
Section: Electron Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These images are recorded directly in digital form. As the finely focused STEM electron beam scans the specimen, the dark-field signal recorded from each image element is, to a close approximation, proportional to the mass ofelectron scattering material present in the sampled portion of specimen (18). Consequently, such data may be used to perform molecular mass calculations for individual particles (19)(20)(21), and we have made a large number ofmeasurements of linear mass density for both native and reassembled IF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0 , Uranyl sulphate, dose= 1.7 x lo4 el/(nm)2; 0, uranyl sulphate, dose= 9 . 6~ lo4 el/(nm)2; x uranyl acetate, dose=O.75x lo4 el/(nrn)2; 3 ) uranyl acetate, dose=10.7x lo4 el/(nm)2. detector (Fertig & Rose, 1977;Ohtsuki et al, 1979). Therefore measurements with this detector signal can be interpreted as reflecting variation in mass thickness rather than 'phase grain'.…”
Section: Stem Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%