2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A refined model for 235U() prompt fission neutron multiplicity and spectrum calculation with validation in integral benchmarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general one may conclude that the present experiment at 90 degree together with nearly all other available numerical data does not confirm the Madland-Nix model [1] or its latest modifications [3]. At presence no model can explain the experimental finding of an anisotropic PFN emission.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general one may conclude that the present experiment at 90 degree together with nearly all other available numerical data does not confirm the Madland-Nix model [1] or its latest modifications [3]. At presence no model can explain the experimental finding of an anisotropic PFN emission.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…It was based on the well known assumption that all fission neutrons are emitted from accelerated fragments. This model or its recent modification [3] has been tested with integral experiments [4] and reasonable well predicts benchmark experiments [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic features of the refined PbP model used in this work were already described in detail in Ref. [43].…”
Section: Calculation In the Incident Energy Range Of The First Fissiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each FF mass pair, two isobars per fragment mass were taken, with values for the nuclear charge Z chosen as the nearest integer values above and below the most probable charge Z p , according to Ref. [43] and refer- ences therein. Consequently for 237 Np(n, f) 84 FF pairs were used in the PbP calculations.…”
Section: Calculation In the Incident Energy Range Of The First Fissiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation