1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.471430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A refined H3 potential energy surface

Abstract: In evaluating some low temperature (T<1000 K) thermal rate coefficients for inelastic rotational excitation of H2 by H atoms, Sun and Dalgarno have found a marked sensitivity to the potential energy surface adopted for the calculations. We have investigated the origin of the discrepancies between previous H3 potential energy surfaces and have developed a refined surface which addresses these concerns. New quasiclassical trajectory calculations of cross sections for low energy rotational excitation are r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
287
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
287
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the high symmetry and electronic simplicitytwo-electron system-of the H 3 ϩ ion, only a few ab initio FCI calculations of the global potential energy surfaces ͑GPES͒, including the correct behavior as the molecule dissociates and for all possible geometrical configurations, have been reported for ground (1 1 AЈ 13,14 ͒ and excited (1 3 ⌺ u ϩ , 15 2 1 AЈ 14 ͒ states and for a maximum of 680 different spatial geometries. This fact contrasts with very accurate GPES obtained for more complex polyatomics such as H 3 , with more than 8000 different spatial geometries, 16 H 2 O, 17,18 H 2 F, 19 or H 4 , 20 to name just a few. Moreover, in a recent paper concerning a first attempt on a calculated spectrum for neardissociation H 3 ϩ , Henderson and Tennyson conclude that, in the absence of a high quality global potential, an attack on the global H 3 ϩ problem would be very worthwhile and is easily within the range of present methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the high symmetry and electronic simplicitytwo-electron system-of the H 3 ϩ ion, only a few ab initio FCI calculations of the global potential energy surfaces ͑GPES͒, including the correct behavior as the molecule dissociates and for all possible geometrical configurations, have been reported for ground (1 1 AЈ 13,14 ͒ and excited (1 3 ⌺ u ϩ , 15 2 1 AЈ 14 ͒ states and for a maximum of 680 different spatial geometries. This fact contrasts with very accurate GPES obtained for more complex polyatomics such as H 3 , with more than 8000 different spatial geometries, 16 H 2 O, 17,18 H 2 F, 19 or H 4 , 20 to name just a few. Moreover, in a recent paper concerning a first attempt on a calculated spectrum for neardissociation H 3 ϩ , Henderson and Tennyson conclude that, in the absence of a high quality global potential, an attack on the global H 3 ϩ problem would be very worthwhile and is easily within the range of present methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We have used symmetry group C s for all the geometries and we have computed 36 different states at each point as follows: 9 1 AЈ, 9 1 AЉ, 9 3 AЈ and 9 3 AЉ. To specify our grids of H 3 ϩ conformations, we have adopted the coordinates used by Boothroyd et al 16 in a refined H 3 potential energy surface. These coordinates can be described by the shortest interatomic distance r 1 , the next-shortest distance r 2 , and the exterior angle between them, .…”
Section: Potential Energy Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned above, the behaviour with collision energy and the magnitudes of the cross sections relate to the v 2 term in the expansion of the interaction potential. For scattering at low energies, the region R ∼ > 4 a 0 is relevant, where the v 2 coefficient calculated by Mielke et al [1] is in distinctly better agreement with that of Partridge et al [4] than that of Boothroyd et al [3]. Consequently, it was not surprising to find that the cross sections which derive from potentials [1] and [4] are also in better agreement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The calculations have been performed by employing a BKMP2 surface. 36 Figure 1 shows the state-to-state DCS as a function of total energy for two scattering angles of θ = 0 and 90°for the rovibrational state v = 0, 1 and j = 0, 2, 4, 6. Clearly, all of the wavepacket DCSs in Figure 1 are in perfect agreement with TID results over the entire energy range.…”
Section: Et Fmentioning
confidence: 99%