Learning Design
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27360-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reference Implementation of a Learning Design Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility is a schema with functions and information completely distributed to the courseware objects of each learner. Both schemata were introduced for the original LD specification included on a single state transition machine that manages all learners [13] and on a P2P network in which the distributed engines assigned to individual learners exchange information regarding the learning sequence [14]. Although the central server schema was used in this investigation, each schema must have different advantages and drawbacks in terms of scalability and flexibility.…”
Section: Implementation Case: Jigsaw Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is a schema with functions and information completely distributed to the courseware objects of each learner. Both schemata were introduced for the original LD specification included on a single state transition machine that manages all learners [13] and on a P2P network in which the distributed engines assigned to individual learners exchange information regarding the learning sequence [14]. Although the central server schema was used in this investigation, each schema must have different advantages and drawbacks in terms of scalability and flexibility.…”
Section: Implementation Case: Jigsaw Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6(b)), and an intermediate schema in which both a central server and courseware objects are responsible for managing learner status and learning sequence. In fact, the original LD specification has been implemented in several ways, including on a single state transition machine that manages all learners [12] and on a P2P network in which the distributed engines assigned to individual learners exchange information regarding the learning sequence [13]. Because of these differences, the implementation schemata would impact the scalability of the system and the effectiveness of implementing management functionality.…”
Section: ) Function To Aggregate and Control Information For Collabomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For supporting the PBL implementation, people possibly use the IMS-LD authoring tools to design PBL processes and produce the UoLs. Then, the UoLs can be interpreted by IMS-LD run-time players, such as CopperCore player (Martens and Vogten 2005) and SLED (McAndrew et al 2005) in order to help the PBL implementation. Our application aims to be able generate the UoLs under the IMS-LD specification, so that we can make use of these existing run-time tools.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%