1989
DOI: 10.1378/chest.95.6.1193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reevaluation of Sputum Microscopy and Culture in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
48
1
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
48
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In smear-positive cases, this approach required less than 2 weeks instead of 8-12 weeks with the standard solid media methods [8,23,24]. Furthermore, in smear-negative cases, this approach reduced the time needed for drug testing using different types of specimens by nearly half, from more than 10 weeks to 5 weeks when solid media were used for primary culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In smear-positive cases, this approach required less than 2 weeks instead of 8-12 weeks with the standard solid media methods [8,23,24]. Furthermore, in smear-negative cases, this approach reduced the time needed for drug testing using different types of specimens by nearly half, from more than 10 weeks to 5 weeks when solid media were used for primary culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of 10-100 bacilli in a milliliter of the sample and culture, a positive result can be obtained. The sensitivity of sputum culture is around 81.5% and the specificity is around 98.4% (14). Solid mediums such as Löwenstein-Jensen or liquid mediums such as Middlebrook H12 are used for culture.…”
Section: A Microbiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[14][15][16][17] Although this study did not evaluate the influence of concurrent HIV infection on the diagnostic capabilities of LED fluorescence microscopy, we presume that the sensitivity in a person with a co-infection would be improved because smears are often reported as negative because of a low bacillary content. 11,16,[18][19][20] Mycobacterial culture with Löwenstein-Jensen medium is not used for routine diagnosis of TB but it is still considered a gold standard even though this method is time-consuming. 10,18,21 Culture with Löwenstein-Jensen medium was only used to determine discrepancies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%