1997
DOI: 10.1006/icar.1997.5713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reevaluation of Impact Melt Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
564
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 461 publications
(599 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(3 reference statements)
28
564
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We have approximated the best-fit computed relationship by equating mass scaling to volume scaling and to one of pure kinetic energy scaling, which is consistent, within uncertainty, to best fit parameters determined by Pierazzo et al [22]. If we take the limit that the deposited heat is efficiently redistributed through the entire planet, and equate the righthand side of equation (1.3) with the resulting thermal energy: M p C P (T p − T s ) then assuming that the entire planet starts off isothermally at T s , 4) where the prime on the heat capacity indicates an effective value that accounts for the latent heat of melting [23], and the efficiency of kinetic energy deposition…”
Section: −2β Pmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have approximated the best-fit computed relationship by equating mass scaling to volume scaling and to one of pure kinetic energy scaling, which is consistent, within uncertainty, to best fit parameters determined by Pierazzo et al [22]. If we take the limit that the deposited heat is efficiently redistributed through the entire planet, and equate the righthand side of equation (1.3) with the resulting thermal energy: M p C P (T p − T s ) then assuming that the entire planet starts off isothermally at T s , 4) where the prime on the heat capacity indicates an effective value that accounts for the latent heat of melting [23], and the efficiency of kinetic energy deposition…”
Section: −2β Pmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A hydrodynamical modelling study [22] found that the amount of melt M melt produced scales with the kinetic energy of the impactor of mass M i and velocity v i as…”
Section: −2β Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now turn to theoretical modeling to assess how much melt should occur from impacts on Vesta. The production of impact melt is highly dependent on impact velocity (e.g., O'Keefe and Ahrens, 1977;Bjorkman and Holsapple, 1987;Pierazzo et al, 1997;Wünnemann et al, 2008). For impacts with a 'melt number' U 2 /E m greater than $ 30, where U is the impact velocity and E m is the internal energy at the critical shock pressure for melting, the volume of the melted region is significantly larger than the volume of the projectile and the melt volume follows a simple linear relationship in log-log space:…”
Section: Results Ii: Modeling Impact Melts On Vestamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46] Impact crater scaling laws predict that the SPA impact excavated through the crust and melted a potentially large volume of mantle material [Melosh, 1989;Pierazzo et al, 1997;Morrison, 1998;Potter et al, 2012;Vaughan and Head, 2013]. In this scenario, a thick layer of impact melt (~45 km) is predicted to line the inner portion of the basin [Morrison, 1998;Vaughan and Head, 2013].…”
Section: Compositional Differences Among Spa Mafic Peaksmentioning
confidence: 99%